[Jacob-list] generations...

fourhornfarm fourhornfarm at verizon.net
Sat Dec 5 22:53:38 EST 2009



----- Original Message -----
From: "Zach Oaster" <zach at zoproduction.com>
To: "Linda" <patchworkfibers at windstream.net>
Cc: <Jacob-list at jacobsheep.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Jacob-list] generations...



> Actually, the ram I had considered was Unzicker Captain himself... who

> by all accounts is a proven great ram... but C generation...

>

> So I guess at this point we've heard from several people who advocate

> for caring less about generations... Is there anyone out there who

> would advocate strongly for moving generations forward? I mean, the

> generational registration is there for a reason right? Hypothetically,

> if one buys/breeds good sheep AND advances the generations of

> registered sheep, isn't that good for the breed as a whole? If my goal

> is to proliferate and advance the Jacob as a breed (since they are

> "threatened"), wouldn't encouraging solid generational breeding be

> good? ...or would it simply move the Jacob closer to a commercial

> standardization (which most would label a bad thing, including me).

>

> Could someone with a strong opinion toward positive generational

> breeding give some insight as to how to maintain the uniqueness of the

> breed at the same time as advancing generations?

>

> Thanks everyone!

>

Zach,

Maybe someone else will give you a more positive reason for selecting E
or F generation over C generation. The theory of higher letters being better
sheep would depend on what quality of sheep were kept for breeding.
It is my opinion that knowing the parents, grand-parents,
great-grandparents, etc. and what they looked like is more important than
the number of generations that have been registered.
We all know that not every Jacob lamb born is a good representative of
the breed. Many of my lambs are culled, even though they would be
registrable, because they are not high quality enough for me to put out
there with my farm name on their pedigree. I want Jacobs that carry my farm
name to be something I can be proud that came from my farm.
I also do not like to buy or sell lambs because Jacob horns do not
attain the majority of their growth until the age of two and horns can
change direction dramatically between even one and two years of age. I have
occasionally made an exception to my rule, but only twice, and in one of
those two cases I was greatly disappointed in how the lamb turned out when
it was 2 yrs. old.
When you purchase lambs you know you are taking a chance on those lambs
turning out great or turning out to be culls or somewhere in between. A ram
whose horns are acceptable for registration at a year old may not be
acceptable by two years old. That is just the way it is and that is one
reason I prefer to buy Jacobs two years of age or older.

Carl

> ^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^

> Zach Oaster

> zach at fattoaster.com

> ^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^

> Visit Zach's worship resource and blog site: http://www.fattoaster.com

> Visit Zach & Lindsay's farm blog: http://fattoasterfarm.wordpress.com

> ^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^

>

>

>

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Linda <patchworkfibers at windstream.net>

> wrote:

>> I sure wouldn't limit my gene pool to only D and above animals. The first

>> thing I look at when I get my flock book is the FF listing. Some of the

>> animals registered as FF might be auction sheep with no known

>> background -

>> but some might be concentrated Lesseau via Fine Fettle or Fieldwood via

>> Culloden. I certainly was happy to add a Yakob-Tson ram to my flock back

>> in

>> 2000, even though I had to register him as FF. The Reynold's flock has

>> recently come back to JSBA and are coming in as FF.

>> At this point in my breeding, I probably wouldn't go with an FF ram

>> unless

>> the breeder had kept records (with pictures - especially of the maternal

>> line).I like to know whatever I can about the background of my breeding

>> stock. You are talking about a C generation ram, which I gather from

>> Betty's

>> post is an Unzicker Captain son. Nice lines with plenty of information

>> available.

>> I have a beautiful F generation ewe from Gary. I bought her because she

>> is a

>> nice ewe in all respects. I would have bought her if she had been several

>> generations down.

>>

>> Linda

>>

>> Hello all,

>>

>> My wife Lindsay and I recently started our flock of jacobs with 3 ewes

>> from Gary Anderson. Two of them are E generation, and one is D. Their

>> lambs in the spring will all be E (they are being bred right now to a

>> D generation ram on-loan from Gary).

>>

>> Lasell Bartlet and I were chatting about the value of moving the

>> generations forward vs. just breeding good sheep. Lasell put it this

>> way, "...for some it might certainly be a selling point -- but not

>> sure what exactly it proves"... she talked about how she had been

>> breeding good sheep for years, and only recently started to register

>> some of them. She posed the question, which I will now pass along to

>> the experts here in the group, "what might be the value of E (or

>> later) generation versus FF generation Jacobs."

>>

>> The reason the conversation started in the first place was because I

>> was hesitant to buy a really nice C generation ram from Lasell because

>> it would "set back" the offspring of my ewes (generationally...

>> otherwise, the ram is awesome). If my goal is to responsibly breed

>> good sheep that are continually bettering the breed, should I concern

>> myself with generation?

>>

>> Thanks in advance for your insight.

>>

>> PS... Lasell approves of me asking the question with her name

>> attached... she was going to ask if I didn't.

>> ^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^

>> Zach Oaster

>> zach at fattoaster.com

>> ^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^

>> Visit Zach's worship resource and blog site: http://www.fattoaster.com

>> Visit Zach & Lindsay's farm blog: http://fattoasterfarm.wordpress.com

>> ^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^

>> _______________________________________________

>> Jacob-list mailing list, sponsored by Swallow Lane Farm & Fiberworks

>> Jacob-list at jacobsheep.com

>> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/jacob-list

>>

>>

>>

>> --

>> Patchwork Farm Jacob Sheep

>> _______________________________________________

>> Jacob-list mailing list, sponsored by Swallow Lane Farm & Fiberworks

>> Jacob-list at jacobsheep.com

>> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/jacob-list

>>

>>

> _______________________________________________

> Jacob-list mailing list, sponsored by Swallow Lane Farm & Fiberworks

> Jacob-list at jacobsheep.com

> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/jacob-list

>





More information about the Jacob-list mailing list