ra 3.0.0 client vs 2.0.6 Argus data - Bug?

[Jesper Skou Jensen]

Yes, on two different Argus boxes. 2.0.6 on the old box and 3.0.0 on the 
new.

The ra mentioned below is the the 3.0.0 version and it's reading the 
2.0.6 logs.


-- 

   Jesper S. Jensen
UNI-C - Århus, Danmark


Dave Edelman wrote:
> Do you have a mix of 2.0 and 3.0 clients?
> 
> 
> 
> Dave Edelman
> +1 917 331-0112 cell
> 
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 4:12, Jesper Skou Jensen 
> <jesper.skou.jensen at uni-c.dk> wrote:
> 
>> carter at qosient.com wrote:
>>> Hey Jesper,
>>
>> Hi Carter,
>>
>> Thank you for the quick answer.
>>
>>> The data model in 3.0.0 is much different, and so the size of the 
>>> file, etc, is not a good metric for comparison.
>>> I use racount() to compare if the basic contents are the same.
>>
>> Ok, thanks for the info.
>>
>>> The situation where you read a 2.0.6 file and generate 2.0.6_new 
>>> looks to be the one that has big problems, as it looks like you are 
>>> missing 90% ?
>>
>> Yea, that's quite a big problem imo, and yea there is missing quite a 
>> lot of data.
>>
>> > Is ra() vaulting?
>>
>> Do you mean if it's crashing or writing any garbage or something like 
>> that? No. Not that I know of. The output I posted was/is all it gives.
>>
>> racount confirms what wc did, the _new logfile only contains a 
>> fraction of the original log.
>>
>> If I do eg:
>> ra -r argus_2.0.6.argus |tail
>>
>> I do get the last entries in the log, so the read part appears to be 
>> running ok. It must be the write that that goes wrong somehow?
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>>  Jesper S. Jensen
>> UNI-C - Århus, Danmark
>>