ra 3.0.0 client vs 2.0.6 Argus data - Bug?

[Dave Edelman]

Do you have a mix of 2.0 and 3.0 clients?



Dave Edelman
+1 917 331-0112 cell

On Jan 30, 2009, at 4:12, Jesper Skou Jensen <jesper.skou.jensen at uni-c.dk 
 > wrote:

> carter at qosient.com wrote:
>> Hey Jesper,
>
> Hi Carter,
>
> Thank you for the quick answer.
>
>> The data model in 3.0.0 is much different, and so the size of the  
>> file, etc, is not a good metric for comparison.
>> I use racount() to compare if the basic contents are the same.
>
> Ok, thanks for the info.
>
>> The situation where you read a 2.0.6 file and generate 2.0.6_new  
>> looks to be the one that has big problems, as it looks like you are  
>> missing 90% ?
>
> Yea, that's quite a big problem imo, and yea there is missing quite  
> a lot of data.
>
> > Is ra() vaulting?
>
> Do you mean if it's crashing or writing any garbage or something  
> like that? No. Not that I know of. The output I posted was/is all it  
> gives.
>
> racount confirms what wc did, the _new logfile only contains a  
> fraction of the original log.
>
> If I do eg:
> ra -r argus_2.0.6.argus |tail
>
> I do get the last entries in the log, so the read part appears to be  
> running ok. It must be the write that that goes wrong somehow?
>
>
> -- 
>
>  Jesper S. Jensen
> UNI-C - Århus, Danmark
>