hole in the argus archive on theorygroup.org

[Carter Bullard]

Hey Peter,
   Does the channel bonding preserve the ethernet addresses
on the packets?  That's one of the major problems with Linux's
'any' interface.

Carter

Carter Bullard
QoSient, LLC
300 E. 56th Street, Suite 18K
New York, New York  10022

carter at qosient.com
Phone +1 212 588-9133
Fax   +1 212 588-9134
http://qosient.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
[mailto:owner-argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Van
Epp
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:20 AM
To: argus
Subject: Re: hole in the argus archive on theorygroup.org


	For at least me, it wasn't only the archive that missed these. I

don't find any of the three posted so far in my mail file either (and
I'm quite interested because dark fibre and a GigE link are in my and
more 
importantly in my argus's short term future. Did others on the list see
these or was there a black hole for a while?
	While I'm here a suggestion I came across elsewhere: the Linux
channel bonding code from George Becker works with GigE cards and can
combine two 
GigE outputs in to a single logical device for feeding to things (such
as 
for instance argus). In combination with the "Turbo" zero copy packet
capture code in Linux this may be interesting.
	Which operating system is the CMU argus running on (I don't see
it in the interesting list of machines I should be considering buying
:-))?

Peter Van Epp / Operations and Technical Support 
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. Canada

> 
> 
> There aren't any posts recorded in the archive between 2/8-2/13..  Was

> there a problem in there?  I know there were a few posts, especially 
> some responses to Russell's "Giving a talk on Argus" query - including

> the one fairly extensive post detailing some of our configuration work

> at CMU..
> 
> Carter, do you have a copy that perhaps can be reposted on the 
> archive? Mark.
> 
<snip of interesting post>