argus-2.0 or argus-2.0.0?
Mark Poepping
poepping at cmu.edu
Tue Feb 6 13:36:58 EST 2001
argus-2.0 or argus-2.0.0?I'd say 2.0.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-argus at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
[mailto:owner-argus at lists.andrew.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of Carter Bullard
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Argus (E-mail)
Subject: argus-2.0 or argus-2.0.0?
Gentle people,
I have been developing the "announcement" for the beta status
of Argus and I've noticed that announcing that Argus-2.1.0
is in beta, makes people think they've been missing something.
So I'm considering dropping the release version numbers
back to either Argus-2.0 or Argus-2.0.0.
Before I start telling people outside the list, what do you guys
think? Argus-2.0, Argus-2.0.0 or Argus-2.1.0? For most on the
list this is really boring, but for some, this is important.
If anyone has any strong opinions, I'm definitely open to
suggestion.
Carter
Carter Bullard
QoSient, LLC
300 E. 56th Street, Suite 18K
New York, New York 10022
carter at qosient.com
Phone +1 212 813-9426
Fax +1 212 813-9426
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/argus/attachments/20010206/9b74d296/attachment.html>
More information about the argus
mailing list