[LargeFormat] lightweight 300mm enlarging/copy/repro lens?

[Jim Hemenway]

Hi Michael:

I also have a clean Rodenstock Apo-Geragon 1:9 f 210mm process lens, 
also without a shutter.

$45

Jim

Michael Sullivan wrote:

> Dear Jim,
> 
> Interesting. I just went to Rodenstock's website 
> (http://www.rodenstockoptics.de/pg3.html) and at the bottom of that page 
> they claim that their PROCESS LENSES are optimized for 3:1 to 1:3, so it 
> would seem to fit the bill nicely!
> 
> The remaining key question then is: what does your Apo-Ronar 300mm weigh?
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 19, 2004, at 3:58 PM, Jim Hemenway wrote:
> 
>> Hi Michael:
>>
>> I don't know enough about the specs of most lenses to give you a 
>> useful answer.  It was used as a process lens so I guess that it's 
>> indeed made for 1:1.  I had missed the 3:1 part of your message, sorry.
>>
>> Jim
>>