[LargeFormat] lightweight 300mm enlarging/copy/repro lens?

[Jim Hemenway]

Hi Michael:

I don't know enough about the specs of most lenses to give you a useful 
answer.  It was used as a process lens so I guess that it's indeed made 
for 1:1.  I had missed the 3:1 part of your message, sorry.

Jim



Michael Sullivan wrote:

> The Apo-Ronar -- that's ideal for 1:1, isn't it?
> I wonder how it will compare at 3:1 to an enlarging lens?
> 
> mjs
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 19, 2004, at 2:10 PM, Jim Hemenway wrote:
> 
>> Hi Michael:
>>
>> I have a Rodenstock Apo-Ronar-Cl 1:9 f 300 process lens if you're 
>> interested.
>>
>> $110.00
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jim Hemenway
>> Winchester, MA
>>
>> Michael Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>> Dear List,
>>> I'm in need of a lightweight enlarging/copy/repro lens in the 300m 
>>> length.
>>> I currently own a Rodenstock Rodagon 300mm, but it is one heavy beast!!
>>> In comparison,  my Apo-Nikkor 360mm weighs but a fraction.
>>> The ideal lens would be optimally used at 3:1 copying artwork.
>>> Any recommendations?
>>> Michael Sullivan
>>> THE PRINTWRIGHT STUDIO
>>> P.O. Box 552
>>> Marshfield Hills MA 02051
>>> 617.529.0603 cell
>>> http://www.haywood-sullivan.com/printwright
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LargeFormat mailing list
>> LargeFormat@f32.net
>> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat
>>
>>
> Michael Sullivan
> THE PRINTWRIGHT STUDIO
> P.O. Box 552
> Marshfield Hills MA 02051
> 617.529.0603 cell
> http://www.haywood-sullivan.com/printwright
> 
>