[LargeFormat] Large Format SLR

tripspud largeformat@f32.net
Wed Feb 4 16:04:26 2004


Hi Philip,

      Yeah, I hear you on this.  It's just that a large SLR fills a spot, it
don't replace everything.

rich

philip lambert wrote:

> Hi Rich!
> It is an interesting claim but I doubt such a camera is as simple/fast to
> operate as e.g. the lightweight plastic Nikon f55 I bought my son .
> Autofocus/autoexposure/autowind/zoom in or out and press the button.  It
> takes a few seconds to fire a dozen shots. How long does it take you to
> change darkslides with the 5x4 reflex?  Now if you were to argue that the
> quality of a 10x8 enlargement from the 5x4 camera would wipe the floor with
> the Nikon I would hasten to agree, but quick on the draw? Hardly. Portable?
> Transportable for sure. (Mack truck)  We haven't spoken about value for
> money but I don't see why that need enter into the debate - this is not a
> column for cheap photography.  I guess the lack of wide-angle facility
> limits it to standard lens or longer focus, so good in the studio or for
> portraits.  Candid shots?  Secret pictures like a Minox? I'm joking.  It
> certainly stops the chatter when it appears in public.  Philip
> > Hi Philip!
> >
> >        A large format SLR can be used handheld or placed on a table, park
> bench, etc.
> > The large format SLR is as quick on the draw as a modern roll film
> > or 35mm camera.  Often today, you can't use a tripod without hassle.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Rich Lahrson
> > Berkeley, California
> > tripspud@transbay.net
> >
> > philip lambert wrote:
> >
> > > A most impressive piece of furniture.  If it's not a daft question, how
> is
> > > it better than a conventional monorail with a mirror back viewfinder?  I
> had
> > > one on a 5x4 which worked well and I could shut the bellows up for a
> 65mm S
> > > Angulon.  Difficult to see the edges of the image though.
> > > Don't see any way of using a 54 single lens reflex with a wideangle lens
> > > unless somebody is making a retrofocus 75mm with a 150mm back focus.  I
> used
> > > to have a Thornton Pickard quarter plate camera with a 6 inch Triotar
> lens
> > > and there was no way a wideangle would fit and clear the rising mirror.
> > > Philip
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jim Hemenway" <Jim@hemenway.com>
> > > To: "Large Format Group" <largeformat@f32.net>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 5:31 PM
> > > Subject: [LargeFormat] Large Format SLR
> > >
> > > > The $1,000 I paid for my Graflex, plus $500 to Grimes for overhauling
> > > > it, doesn't seem too much now after seeing the price for this.
> > > > http://www.wisner.com/freedom.htm
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > LargeFormat mailing list
> > > > LargeFormat@f32.net
> > > > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LargeFormat mailing list
> > > LargeFormat@f32.net
> > > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LargeFormat mailing list
> > LargeFormat@f32.net
> > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat
>
> _______________________________________________
> LargeFormat mailing list
> LargeFormat@f32.net
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat