[LargeFormat] Polaroid film

Vincent Dobson largeformat@f32.net
Thu May 22 14:20:20 2003


Stan,

I was referring to using Kodak readyload film in the Polaroid holder - I too
had no problems using the Polaroid film in the holder, only with the
readyloads.

Vince Dobson
Visions In Nature
www.VisionsInNature.com

<:)-----Original Message-----
<:)From: largeformat-admin@f32.net [mailto:largeformat-admin@f32.net]On
<:)Behalf Of Stan McQueen
<:)Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 11:58 AM
<:)To: largeformat@f32.net
<:)Subject: RE: [LargeFormat] Polaroid film
<:)
<:)
<:)At 07:03 AM 5/22/2003, Vince Dobson wrote:
<:)>He said it right about the money because (it was my experience) you must
<:)>shoot at least 4 of each shot because 3 of them would be ruined
<:)by fog.  The
<:)>first time I used my Polaroid holder with redi-loads was on a
<:)trip (from GA)
<:)>to Nova Scotia (to save weight) ---- very few of my images were
<:)not ruined
<:)>by fog.  Perhaps I had a defective holder?
<:)
<:)You may have, because that has not been my experience. I shoot one sheet
<:)(exposed for the negative), remove it from the holder without
<:)processing,
<:)then take it home and process it later. I have never had one
<:)fogged (unless
<:)you count the time that when I removed the polaroid from the holder only
<:)the sleeve came out, leaving behind the negative).
<:)
<:)Stan
<:)
<:)================================
<:)Photography by Stan McQueen
<:)http://www.smcqueen.com
<:)
<:)
<:)_______________________________________________
<:)LargeFormat mailing list
<:)LargeFormat@f32.net
<:)http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat