[LargeFormat] Critiqueing Photos

largeformat@f32.net largeformat@f32.net
Sun Dec 9 12:49:17 2001 

--part1_17c.6e8f3c.2944fc07_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

When I have the opportunity to juror  photographs, I look for IMPACT, 
TECHNIQUE, and COMPOSITION. Unless a print has impact, a juror will not look 
at it twice. The reality is that no two jurors will judge a show in the same 
way. I've had photos win "best of show" in some exhibits and not even get an 
honorable mention in others. Every juror brings their background, personal 
experiences, bias, and other baggage. When it comes to art, I doubt if one 
can, or should, be totally objective.   

Dave D.            

--part1_17c.6e8f3c.2944fc07_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>When I have the opportunity to juror &nbsp;photographs, I look for IMPACT, TECHNIQUE, and COMPOSITION. Unless a print has impact, a juror will not look at it twice. The reality is that no two jurors will judge a show in the same way. I've had photos win "best of show" in some exhibits and not even get an honorable mention in others. Every juror brings their background, personal experiences, bias, and other baggage. When it comes to art, I doubt if one can, or should, be totally objective. &nbsp;&nbsp;
<BR>
<BR>Dave D. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></HTML>

--part1_17c.6e8f3c.2944fc07_boundary--