[LargeFormat] Rodenstock Web Site?

Paul and Paula Butzi largeformat@f32.net
Tue Jul 17 11:10:14 2001


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ade Talabi" <adetalabi@claranet.co.uk>
To: <largeformat@f32.net>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [LargeFormat] Rodenstock Web Site?


> Paul Butzi,
>
> http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/testing.html
>
> Paul and Paula Butzi (butzi@nwlink.com) said thusly on [16/07/01 at
17:14]:
>
> >
> > > Paul and Paula Butzi,
> > >
> > > In order of best quality
> > > 1. Fujinon
> > > 2. Nikkor
> > > 3. Apo-Ronar
> >
> > What sort of testing did you do?  It's pretty interesting that you feel
the
> > Fuji outperforms the Nikkor - that makes it one mighty fine lens.
> >

I guess I'm confused.  I look at Chris's results page, and I see nothing
for the 300mm Fuji-C, nor for the 300mm Apo-Ronar.

Are you saying that you used Chris's test methodology?  What were the
results for each lens?

-Paul