[LargeFormat] Rodenstock Web Site?

[Clive Warren]

At 17:22 16/07/01 +0100, Ade Talabi wrote:
>Paul Butzi,
>
>http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/testing.html
>
>Paul and Paula Butzi (butzi@nwlink.com) said thusly on [16/07/01 at 17:14]:
>
> >
> > > Paul and Paula Butzi,
> > >
> > > In order of best quality
> > > 1. Fujinon
> > > 2. Nikkor
> > > 3. Apo-Ronar
> >
> > What sort of testing did you do?  It's pretty interesting that you feel the
> > Fuji outperforms the Nikkor - that makes it one mighty fine lens.
> >
> > -Paul

Well there is no test of the Fujiinon C nor the Ronar on Chris and Kerry's 
pages. The interesting results are from the Fujinon T 300mm which gives a 
very repectable performance given that it's a tele design. Disadvantages: 
there are less coverage and playing around with movements due to the tele 
design.

Cheers,
           Clive