[Jacob-list] "lilac carriers"
Linda
patchworkfibers at windstream.net
Wed Jun 16 15:31:33 EDT 2010
That makes more sense :-)
Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> You're right, I left a word out. A "regular" or "true" lilac should
> ALWAYS produce carriers OR more true lilacs. I meant to say/ //If
> both parents are "regular lilac" _carriers_...the non-lilac offspring
> have a 67% chance of being carriers/ (as you say). / /If both parents
> are true lilac, then the lambs should be true lilac. It's the other
> non-black colors being lumped in as lilacs that mess up these percentages
>
>
>
> -Dan
>
>
>
> *From:* jacob-list-bounces at jacobsheep.com
> [mailto:jacob-list-bounces at jacobsheep.com] *On Behalf Of *Linda
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:20 AM
> *To:* Dan Carpenter
> *Cc:* jacob-list at jacobsheep.com; 'Brenda'
> *Subject:* Re: [Jacob-list] "lilac carriers"
>
>
>
> If "true" lilacs are a recessive, as I think you agreed, then wouldn't
> the offspring of a true lilac carry one lilac gene from that parent
> and thus be a carrier? The non-lilac offspring of two proven lilac
> carriers would have a 67% chance of being a carrier, but it looks to
> me that the offspring of a true lilac bred to not-lilac is going to
> carry lilac.
> I am calling "true" lilacs those lilac sheep that bred together,
> always produce lilacs. I have heard the term 'dark lilac' to refer to
> those lilacs that do not breed true. I use the term 'chocolate lilac'
> to refer to sheep with chocolate facial and leg markings and wool.
> Mine breed true. I see very few 'blue' lilacs around here.
>
> Linda
>
>
> Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> Some people say you can tell by the presence of an "eye ring," but I
> haven't found that to be reliable. If both parents are "regular
> lilac" (as opposed to, say, "chocolate lilac") the non-lilac offspring
> have a 67% chance of being carriers. If one parent is regular lilac
> the non-lilac offspring have a 50% chance of being carriers. If one
> or both of the parents are called lilac, but are not regular lilac,
> then it's anybodies guess.
>
>
>
> *From:* jacob-list-bounces at jacobsheep.com
> <mailto:jacob-list-bounces at jacobsheep.com>
> [mailto:jacob-list-bounces at jacobsheep.com] *On Behalf Of *Brenda
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:22 AM
> *To:* jacob-list at jacobsheep.com <mailto:jacob-list at jacobsheep.com>
> *Subject:* [Jacob-list] "lilac carriers"
>
>
>
> Hi, all-
>
>
>
> I see sheep advertised from time to time as lilac carriers. Can we
> know if a non-lilac sheep is a carrier before seeing lilac offspring?
> If both parents are lilacs, would a non-lilac lamb have to be a
> carrier? I am thinking of simple genetics where I'd expect some would
> be non-lilac and not carriers, some non-lilac but carriers, and some
> lilacs if both parents were lilac. If only one parent was a lilac I
> would expect a significant percentage of non-lilacs to NOT be
> carriers. But nothing is simple with Jacob genetics, is it?
>
>
>
> Brenda
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 9.0.829 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2939 - Release Date:
> 06/15/10 02:35:00
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jacob-list mailing list, sponsored by Swallow Lane Farm & Fiberworks
> Jacob-list at jacobsheep.com <mailto:Jacob-list at jacobsheep.com>
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/jacob-list
>
>
>
>
> --
> Patchwork Farm Jacob Sheep <http://www.patchworkfibers.com>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.829 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2939 - Release Date:
> 06/16/10 02:35:00
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jacob-list mailing list, sponsored by Swallow Lane Farm & Fiberworks
> Jacob-list at jacobsheep.com
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/jacob-list
>
--
Patchwork Farm Jacob Sheep <http://www.patchworkfibers.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/jacob-list/attachments/20100616/5eedeedf/attachment.htm>
More information about the Jacob-list
mailing list