[AGL] life is so much fun dept.

[Michael Eisenstadt]

On 3/15/2019 8:07 PM, Michael Eisenstadt wrote:
> Kathy you are missing the point of what I said.
>
> I find Elizabeth Warren quite attractive: blond and blue eyes. I'm 
> serious, she is quite cute in a kind of shy schoolmistressy way 
> (rimless glasses) but probably harboring deep sensual currents below 
> the surface - or so I'd like to believe. Her natural brunette hair 
> (I've seen the pictures) made her bogus claim for affirmative action 
> as a feather Indian not impossible to carry out. I doubt she would 
> have tried this (successful) imposture had she been naturally blond as 
> dot Indians are never blonds.
>
> It is her policies that I object to LOUDLY. She is for OPEN BORDERS. 
> The fact that her 2 daughters married dot Indians (legal immigrants 
> I'll bet) and that she is the proud grandmother of brown grandchildren 
> (I've seen the pictures of them and her together) shouldn't affect her 
> patriotism but who knows? Her character seems blameless: only 1 
> divorce. Asked about reparations for colored folks she weaseled her 
> way out of that nasty question by babbling about the necessity of 
> "having a conversation" a phrase typical of hypocritical discourse so 
> common these days. Imagine if she said that POC (aka colored folks) 
> have had 60 years of affirmative actions, government contracts 
> preference, and other legal advantages and that it was time for them 
> to stand on their own two feet. As you might imagine, there are many 
> blacks who would say the same privately and some of them have said so 
> publicly.
>
> On 3/15/2019 7:21 PM, Kdoyle wrote:
>> so michael, most of your dislike of Warren is  not about the content 
>> of her policies or her character, but that she changes her hair color 
>> and hair style? Sheesh.
>> Perhaps you have noticed that people, and women in particular, do 
>> that often, change their hair color and style. And women wear a wider 
>> variety of clothes and shoes than men do too. so what?
>> Personally I think that in our society because males, from infancy 
>> are not allowed silk, or satin or velvet, or pink, or flowers, they 
>> are deliberately sensually inhibited from birth. Girls get all those 
>> things AND plaid, and corduroy and yellow and blue and green, too.and 
>> we can wear dungarees or twirl in pretty skirts, unlike you poor 
>> fellas who have to stick to scratchy jeans.  So from the get go we 
>> grow up with more textural and visual variety and flexibility and 
>> carry it on to our adult life; which I think is a fine fun and 
>> creative thing.
>>
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/austin-ghetto-list/attachments/20190315/e3433405/attachment.html>