[AGL] reply to Michele's statement
Bill Irwin
billi at aloha.net
Thu Nov 2 14:23:10 EST 2006
Pretty good deconstruction Mike.
If you want wisdom you first have to get rid of delusions. One delusion
that should go first is that one has free will.
Aloha
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Eisenstadt" <michaele at ando.pair.com>
To: "survivors' reminiscences about Austin Ghetto Daze in the 60s"
<austin-ghetto-list at pairlist.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:58 AM
Subject: [AGL] reply to Michele's statement
> Michele,
>
> You have often spoken to me on this subject but never at such
> length. Permit me to reply interlinearly to some of what you've written.
>
> >I believe that God (or whatever name you choose) made us
> because He/She needed love—that in some way He was lonely
> and because He had a need to "see Himself"
>
> According to Hegel, the attempt "to see Himself/Oneself" is the
> ultimate exercise of human consciousness. This suggests to me
> that the attributes you have identified as God's are merely
> human projections.
>
> >He placed us in a perfect place where all our needs were met (without
> spilling a drop of blood). He gave us free will—otherwise how would we
> be like Him and what would our love be worth if we didn't choose it?
>
> Once again, why does free will require a God? Logically, in assuming
> the existence of God, you are committing the error of petitio
> principii (assuming the conclusion as your starting point).
>
> Now I know that you will remind me of your personal experiences
> with you know who. That solves the petitio principii problem. But
> that brings up the veracity of testimonial or testifying. Would that I
> could accept testimony. Testimony is worthless unless confirmed.
>
> >Then came curiosity. Had things progressed in the way He wanted, we
> would have been good, obedient students, matching knowledge with wisdom
> and growing towards oneness with Him.
> The Tree of Knowledge was not all about sex, it was about sex and
> everything else. Seduced by instant gratification, we transgressed—not
> waiting to learn wisdom as He intended to teach us.
>
> You are assuming that "seduced by instant gratification" is a bad
> thing. You may know this from personal experience. But that is
> not my personal experience. I see absolutely no reason why instant
> sexual or other gratification is bad.
>
> As for wisdom which we all crave, to believe that the deity desires
> that we pursue it, that too is a human projection, an admirable
> one to be sure. There has been a little progress in the human
> pursuit of wisdom. A necessary condition was the invention of
> writing. Part of our progress towards wisdom consists of
> practicing the ascesis of avoiding logical errors. Part of it has
> been the realization that received beliefs (about God and on
> other subjects) are to be examined closely for possible errors.
> Then we can try to think through the issues. If there is no
> reason and no evidence for a belief in God (my viewpoint),
> it is best abandonned as an impediment to the pursuit of
> wisdom.
>
> That's as far as i got in your letter at this time.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
More information about the Austin-ghetto-list
mailing list