The taliban returns to fill the void...
Frances Morey
frances_morey@excite.com
Thu Jan 29 08:44:02 2004
This story makes our problems pale by comparison. Then again, I heard recently that those of us who can add, subtract, multiply and divide are among the top 5% of the world's population in educational terms.
This news spotting came to me courtesy of Beverly Veltman.
Frances
> Despite being in the Washington Post, this story is just not getting
> > picked up:
> > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21321-2004Jan15.html
> >
> > This is the liberty we bring in our wake.
> >
> > Women in Iraq Decry Decision To Curb Rights
> > Council Backs Islamic Law on Families
> >
> > By Pamela Constable
> > Washington Post Foreign Service
> > Friday, January 16, 2004; Page A12
> >
> > BAGHDAD, Jan. 15 -- For the past four decades, Iraqi women have enjoyed
> > some of the most modern legal protections in the Muslim world, under a
> > civil code that prohibits marriage below the age of 18, arbitrary
> > divorce and male favoritism in child custody and property inheritance
> > disputes.
> >
> > Saddam Hussein's dictatorship did not touch those rights. But the
> > U.S.-backed Iraqi Governing Council has voted to wipe them out, ordering
> > in late December that family laws shall be "canceled" and such issues
> > placed under the jurisdiction of strict Islamic legal doctrine known as
> > sharia.
> >
> > This week, outraged Iraqi women -- from judges to cabinet ministers --
> > denounced the decision in street protests and at conferences, saying it
> > would set back their legal status by centuries and could unleash
> > emotional clashes among various Islamic strains that have differing
> > rules for marriage, divorce and other family issues.
> >
> > "This will send us home and shut the door, just like what happened to
> > women in Afghanistan," said Amira Hassan Abdullah, a Kurdish lawyer who
> > spoke at a protest meeting Thursday. Some Islamic laws, she noted, allow
> > men to divorce their wives on the spot.
> >
> > "The old law wasn't perfect, but this one would make Iraq a jungle," she
> > said. "Iraqi women will accept it over their dead bodies."
> >
> > The order, narrowly approved by the 25-member council in a closed-door
> > session Dec. 29, was reportedly sponsored by conservative Shiite
> > members. The order is now being opposed by several liberal members as
> > well as by senior women in the Iraqi government.
> >
> > The council's decisions must be approved by L. Paul Bremer, the chief
> > U.S. administrator in Iraq, and aides said unofficially that his
> > imprimatur for this change was unlikely. But experts here said that once
> > U.S. officials turn over political power to Iraqis at the end of June,
> > conservative forces could press ahead with their agenda to make sharia
> > the supreme law. Spokesmen for Bremer did not respond to requests for
> > comment Thursday.
> >
> > "It was the secret way this was done that is such a shock," said Nasreen
> > Barawi, a woman who is Iraq's minister for social welfare and public
> > service. "Iraq is a multiethnic society with many different religious
> > schools. Such a sweeping decision should be made over time, with an
> > opportunity for public dialogue." There is no immediate threat of the
> > decision becoming law, Barawi said, "but after June 30, who knows what
> > can happen?"
> >
> > In interviews at several meetings and protests, women noted that even
> > during the politically repressive Hussein era, women had been allowed to
> > assume a far more modern role than in many other Muslim countries and
> > had been shielded from some of the more egregiously unfair
> > interpretations of Islam advocated by conservative, male-run Muslim
> > groups.
> >
> > Once Hussein was toppled, several women noted wryly, they hoped the new
> > authorities would further liberalize family law. Instead, in the process
> > of wiping old laws off the books, they said, Islamic conservatives on
> > the Governing Council are trying to impose retrograde views of women on
> > a chaotic postwar society.
> >
> > Although it remained unclear which members of the council had promoted
> > the shift of family issues from civil to religious jurisprudence, the
> > decision was made and formalized while Abdul Aziz Hakim, a Shiite Muslim
> > who heads the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, was
> > chairing the council under a rotating leadership system.
> >
> > This week, several moderate council members spoke strongly against the
> > decision in public forums, calling it a threat to both civilized
> > progress and national unity. Nasir Chaderchi, a lawyer and council
> > member who heads the National Democratic Party, criticized the council's
> > action at a professional women's meeting Thursday. "We don't want to be
> > isolated from modern developments," Chaderchi told the gathering of the
> > Iraqi Independent Women's Group. "What hurts most is that the law of the
> > tyrant Saddam was more modern than this new law." He said he hoped women
> > would continue to protest until the order was reversed.
> >
> > The council's new policy decree was brief and vague, mentioning neither
> > particular family issues nor individual branches of Islamic law that
> > would replace current civil law. But lawyers and other experts from
> > Iraqi women's groups said the ambiguity of the decision was especially
> > worrisome, since rival Islamic sects in Iraq espouse different policies
> > for women's legal and marital rights.
> >
> > Some critics said the proposed law might exacerbate tensions between
> > Sunni and Shiite Muslims, already divided over other power-sharing
> > issues in postwar Iraq, and could even destroy families that have
> > intermarried between the two strains of Islam. Under Hussein, they said,
> > the universal application of civil family law prevented such issues from
> > sparking sectarian strife.
> >
> > Zakia Ismael Hakki, a female retired judge and outspoken opponent of the
> > new order, said Thursday that since 1959, civil family law had been
> > developed and amended under a series of secular governments to give
> > women a "half-share in society" and an opportunity to advance as
> > individuals, no matter what their religion.
> >
> > "This new law will send Iraqi families back to the Middle Ages," Hakki
> > said. "It will allow men to have four or five or six wives. It will take
> > away children from their mothers. It will allow anyone who calls himself
> > a cleric to open an Islamic court in his house and decide about who can
> > marry and divorce and have rights. We have to stop it."
> >
> > C 2004 The Washington Post Company
> >
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!