[ARGUS] updated debian packages

John Nagro john.nagro at gmail.com
Wed Sep 29 00:30:20 EDT 2004


Thanks for the reply. I agree totaly. If the patch wasnt in the
package then fine, it shouldnt be in the deb package. I was just
making sure you didnt leave something out etc.

Thanks for your work!


On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:12:51 +1000, Andrew Pollock
<andrew-argus at andrew.net.au> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:58:19AM -0400, John Nagro wrote:
> > i just recently installed the updated debian packages, which were
> > supposed to contain fixes...  2.0.6.fixes.1-1... but as it turns out i
> > still had to apply the patch to ragprah (mentioned here on the list)
> > to get it to work prorperly (without the unparsable time errors,
> > etc)... just FYI
> I guess the million dollar question is: were said ragraph fixes shipped in
> 2.0.6.fixes.1 ?
> Not according to the upstream changelog it seems.
> I personally dislike making the Debian package of software different from
> the upstream (I'd like to think the Argus prepackaged for Debian is going to
> walk and talk the same way as Argus prepackaged on other distros, but that's
> obviously totally beyond my control), so I'd be hesistant to start throwing
> random packages into the Debian package of argus-client, with the preference
> that Carter makes a release that contains the fix(es) instead.
> (wow, long sentence)
> regards
> Andrew
> --
> linux.conf.au 2005   -  http://lca2005.linux.org.au/  -  Birthplace of Tux
> April 18th to 23rd   -  http://lca2005.linux.org.au/  -       LINUX
> Canberra, Australia  -  http://lca2005.linux.org.au/  -    Get bitten!

John Nagro
john.nagro at gmail.com

More information about the argus mailing list