[ARGUS] argus-2.0.6 released!!!

[Carter Bullard]

Hey Guys,
   The only reason I used non RFC2606 domain names
was so I could fit the ascii output of the example
record in 80 characters (historical man page limitation).
I would rather use IP addrs instead of names, (but they
are longer than what I used in some of the examples),
just so there is no confusion, advertising, or suggestions
of any kind, whatever they might be.  Can we decide on,
1.2.3.4 or x.y.z.w like names?

Carter


-----Original Message-----
From: spm at healthinsite.gov.au [mailto:spm at healthinsite.gov.au]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 5:19 AM
To: eric-list-argus at catastrophe.net
Cc: Steve McInerney; Carter Bullard; argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: [ARGUS] argus-2.0.6 released!!!

Ahh easy Questions. :-)

a. I'd never heard of a context diff before. Ta! That makes more sense.
b. I have no idea what RFC2606 refers to, but was using the same names
Carter already has in the man page.

Thanks for the tips!

- Steve

> On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 09:29:40 +1000, Steve McInerney proclaimed...
>
>> Man pages eh?
>>
>> The below patch is one I've just written up from my recent Q about
>> finding non-returning TCP connections.
>>
>> I've also added a quick line at the top in the Description about how
>> using ragator might be a "Good Thing(tm)".
>> FWIW, I'm a strong believer in copious examples; so I'd like to dig out
>> some of the common and not so common regular "queries" we run internally
>> for submission and add those - if agreeable?
>
> Why don't you (a) submit a contextual diff and (b) use
> RFC 2606 domain names in your man page?
>
> Just a suggestion.
>
> - Eric
>