[ARGUS] apparant bug in 2.0.6 ...

Carter Bullard carter at qosient.com
Fri Jun 18 14:42:42 EDT 2004


Hey Peter,
   So it may be the FIELD_DELIMITER, if you change it to something
like ',' do the ports come back?  We do make exception to the 0xffff
in the port field, but it should still print something.

Carter



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
[mailto:owner-argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Van Epp
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 2:16 PM
To: argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: [ARGUS] apparant bug in 2.0.6 ...

	I know you don't want to hear this :-) but it looks like there is a
bug (this is the original release I haven't tried fix.1 yet):

	This one is correct I expect:

ra -r archive/2004/06/07/argus.2004.06.07.23.00.00.gz -c -nn host
192.0.0.250
07 Jun 04 23:00:43      f    tcp     192.0.0.250.65535  ?>
192.75.245.160.65535 2        0         108          0           TIM

	This one has lost the port numbers (because they are all 1s
perhaps?):

%ra -F /data/ra.conf -r archive/2004/06/07/argus.2004.06.07.23.00.00.gz -c
-nn host 192.0.0.250
1086674443.424428       1086674443.511333       f       6       192.0.0.250
?>       192.75.245.160  2       0       108     0       TIM


RA_FIELD_DELIMITER='\t'
RA_PRINT_HOSTNAMES=none
RA_FIELD_SPECIFIER=+1lasttime
RA_PRINT_UNIX_TIME=yes
RA_USEC_PRECISION=6

	I tried removing the RA_FIELD_SPECIFIER=+1lasttime but that didn't
help (and thus probably isn't the cause :-)).

Peter Van Epp / Operations and Technical Support
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. Canada






More information about the argus mailing list