argusarchive.
Carter Bullard
carter at qosient.com
Fri Nov 2 09:16:51 EST 2001
Hey Scott,
Yes I found a set of problems relating to writing out
queued records when the file has been removed. I've
fixed them in the 2.0.4 code that is in the test directory.
ftp://qosient.com/dev/argus-2.0/argus-2.0.4.beta.1.tar.gz
Could you give this a try?
Carter
Carter Bullard
QoSient, LLC
300 E. 56th Street, Suite 18K
New York, New York 10022
carter at qosient.com
Phone +1 212 588-9133
Fax +1 212 588-9134
http://qosient.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
> [mailto:owner-argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of
> Scott A. McIntyre
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:26 PM
> To: Carter Bullard
> Cc: 'Argus Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: argusarchive.
>
>
> > If the output file is gone, we will close it, and
> > reestablish the output file, swap the file
> > descriptors and be on our way, but there must be
> > something nefarious going on. With the stack looking corrupted, we
> > may have lost a pointer or an index number, so .... let me take a
> > look around.
>
> I just thought of something else which may be a contributing
> factor, but shouldn't be -- the filesystem is XFS.
>
> Not sure if that will weigh in your considerations, but it
> seems possible that there could be an interaction between the
> journalling and other features of XFS as implemented on
> Linux, and what's going on.
>
> However, this is not the first Linux/XFS system I've run
> Argus on, so this may mean nothing.
>
>
>
>
More information about the argus
mailing list