very quiet list / client release

[Yotam Rubin]

Hey,

       I believe we should separate the clients from the server for the sake of
modularity; there is no reason for one to download both the server
and the clients if one merely wishes to upgrade one's clients or server.
Please note however, that the present distribution is more convenient for
me, because I only need to maintain a single source package. 

       Taking all of the above arguments in account, I support the separation of 
the clients from the server.

	Regards, Yotam Rubin
 

On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:51:30PM -0400, Carter Bullard wrote:
> Gentle people,
>    Since the release of argus-2.0.1 the list has been
> rather quiet.  I presume that that means that things
> are fine.  There are a few nits in some of the clients
> that have come up, and I have some fixes for those,
> and we've had a request for a separate client to provide
> the '-C' feature that was in the argus-1.x set.
> 
>    I'm considering a client only release at the end of
> May, which will be bug fixes the official addition of
> a few clients, including ragrep(), improved man pages
> and hopefully a few contributed clients.
> 
>    Should I have a separate tarfile that one would
> untar over an existing argus distribution, or should
> it be standalone?
> 
> Your opinions are most welcome.
> 
> Carter
> 
> 
> Carter Bullard
> QoSient, LLC
> 300 E. 56th Street, Suite 18K
> New York, New York  10022
> 
> carter at qosient.com
> Phone +1 212 588-9133
> Fax   +1 212 588-9134
> http://qosient.com