argus option review
David Brumley
dbrumley at rtfm.stanford.edu
Thu Jan 25 18:10:05 EST 2001
> The biggest one is "-p". Should we be in promiscuous mode by default?
> My bet is no. Do we have any other votes/opinions?
My vote is to go into promisc mode by default.
>
> The next is the "-P" option. This specifies the port that we will
> listen on for remote access. You set this to 0 (zero) to turn this
> feature off. Should we turn this on or off by default? Should you
> have to explicitly turn on remote access by configuring the port
> number? I'm leaning toward not turning it on unless you
> specify it, but then getting a common number, like 561, will not
> be easy. (this may eliminate some surprises?)
I would leave it off by default.
> Please send your opinions/attitude/reactions/flames/whatever. It is
> important!
The above behaviors can be set in /etc/argus.conf, right? So I think
of more importance is how you set them in the default /etc/argus.conf,
since most people are lazy (including me :)
Also, i've been thinking that perhaps the argus daemon should be
renamed to "argusd", as that seems to be common unix nomenclature.
Last, I have a question. How many people have custom argus scripts
for detecting intrusions? I know I do, and so does russell. Are there
others out there we could benefit from?
cheers,
-david
--
#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#
David Brumley - Stanford Computer Security - dbrumley at Stanford.EDU
Phone: +1-650-723-2445 WWW: http://www.stanford.edu/~dbrumley
Fax: +1-650-725-9121 PGP: finger dbrumley-pgp at sunset.Stanford.EDU
#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#
Fact: you can burn 150 caloria per hour banging your head against a wall
More information about the argus
mailing list