[Retros] Portoroz Codex meeting

Thomas Maeder maeder at glue.ch
Fri Sep 13 11:51:24 EDT 2002


Am 2002.09.13 07:38 schrieb(en) Seth Breidbart:

>

> That would apply even if it weren't considered publication, since too

> many people would have seen it under the name of the sender, prior to

> "publication".


Morally yes.

As far as the PCCC is considered a legal authority, the Codex wording
also makes everything clear from a legal point of view.

--
Thomas




More information about the Retros mailing list