[LargeFormat] F32 web site knacked?

[Steve Bell]

Do we know for sure that Clive is aware of the forum problem? Earlier in the
year when I subscribed to the forum the only way I could contact him was via
the mobile number on the 2004 workshop advert. I'd been trying to email for
months before without success.

Steve Bell

On 28/11/05 5:03 pm, "Brock Nanson" <brock at nanson.org> wrote:

> Let's not get too concerned yet.  As long as this list remains active,
> we can keep in touch and if the f32 forums simply don't come back to
> life, we can make arrangements to move the group elsewhere.  I have some
> ideas about that which would give us our forums back (critiques
> included) without too much fuss or bother.  But lets not abandon ship
> yet.  There have been problems in the past which took some time to sort
> out, but they ultimately were sorted out.
> 
> However, in the event that this mailing list also runs into problems,
> perhaps we should have a repository of email addresses of interested
> members?  If you people want to send me your address to
> f32.net at gmail.com I will keep them on file in the event that f32 simply
> falls off the Internet once and for all.  When a new forum is prepared I
> could email all of you with that information.
> 
> And for the time being, maybe we should discuss/decide what a reasonable
> amount of time to wait for the problems to be sorted out actually is
> before we 'pull the plug'?
> 
> Brock
> 
> Steve Bell wrote:
>> On 27/11/05 8:08 pm, "Karl Wolz" <wolzphoto at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> I'm an APUG member, too, but totally inactive in that large, impersonal
>>> pond.  We have a pleasant community, and it would be a shame to lose it.
>>> If Clive can't get this thing back off the ground, I'd sure like to see
>>> it moved over to another format, even something as simple as Yahoo
>>> groups or an equivalent.
>>> 
>>> BTW, where the heck is the "tube"?
>>> 
>>> Karl Wolz
>> 
>> I'm a APUG member, but not subscriber, I read the LF forum. I develop my own
>> B&W film, send my E6 away for processing, scan my film and print digitally,
>> while APUG is "devoted to traditional (non-digital) photographic processes."
>> so I would be a fraud subscribing and posting. My other concern would be our
>> LF posts disappearing under larger numbers of 35mm and MF images, how likely
>> is that?  F32 was unique, even with its quirks. It's a pity there isn't any
>> open source 'install it and it works' forum software we could use.
>> 
>> Steve Bell
>> 
>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: largeformat-bounces at f32.net [mailto:largeformat-bounces at f32.net]
>>> 
>>> On
>>> 
>>>> Behalf Of Vince Dobson
>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 10:29 AM
>>>> To: f32 Large Format Photography Mail List
>>>> Subject: RE: [LargeFormat] F32 web site knacked?
>>>> 
>>>> I'm a member of APUG, a fine location for me since My health deems me
>>> 
>>> anti
>>> 
>>>> digital.  I have not posted there being involved only in F32 so, If I
>>> 
>>> get
>>> 
>>>> involved elsewhere it would be on that site.
>>>> 
>>>> Vince Dobson
>>>> Visions In Nature
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: largeformat-bounces at f32.net
>>> 
>>> [mailto:largeformat-bounces at f32.net]On
>>> 
>>>> Behalf Of mark blackman
>>>> Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 5:22 AM
>>>> To: 'f32 Large Format Photography Mail List'
>>>> Subject: RE: [LargeFormat] F32 web site knacked?
>>>> 
>>>> OK, we've waited a week, now what? Should we all move en-mass
>>> 
>>> elsewhere? I
>>> 
>>>> see Ole and David are regular contributors to APUG. It's far bigger
>>> 
>>> than F32
>>> 
>>>> and covers all film formats and is vehemently anti-digital. Anyone got
>>> 
>>> any
>>> 
>>>> other ideas? I wouldn't want us to all get lost in some larger forum,
>>> 
>>> I've
>>> 
>>>> grown quite fond of you all!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LargeFormat mailing list
> LargeFormat at f32.net
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat
>