[LargeFormat] Bad Kodak Lens

[James Krysan]

Philip.
Thanks much for the table and the link. I had no idea
that information was so readily available.  
Jim 
--- philip lambert <philip.lambert@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
> It is a virtually new lens.  Look at Schneider's
> site
>
http://www.schneideroptics.com/info/vintage_lens_data/
> from which I copied the following table of serial
> numbers and years
> 
> 1,000,000 November 1936 
> 1,200,000 December 1937 
> 1,400,000 November 1938 
> 1,600,000 September 1939 
> 1,800,000 June 1942 
> 2,000,000 September 1948 
> 2,200,000 July 1949 
> 2,400,000 October 1950 
> 2,600,000 May 1951 
> 2,800,000 November 1951 
> 3,000,000 May 1952 
> 4,000,000 October 1954 
> 5,000,000 February 1957 
> 6,000,000 May 1959 
> 7,000,000 February 1961 
> 8,000,000 March 1963 
> 8,500,000 February 1964 
> 9,000,000 February 1965 
> 9,500,000 September 1965 
> 10,000,000 January 1967 
> 10,500,000 October 1967 
> 11,000,000 November 1968 
> 11,500,000 July 1970 
> 12,000,000 September 15, 1972 
> 12,500,000 March 1974 
> 13,000,000 December 1976 
> 13,200,000 September 1977 
> 13,400,000 Ocotober 1978 
> 13,600,000 October 1979 
> 13,800,000 January 1981 
> 14,000,000 October 1983 
> 14,100,000 January 1985 
> 14,200,000 August 1986 
> 14,300,000 November 1988 
> 14,400,000 January 1991 
> 14,460,000 February 1992 
> 14,480,000 January 1993 
> 14,500,000 November 1993 
> 14,510,000 January 1994 
> 14,520,000 May 1994 
> 14,540,000 January 1995 
> 14,560,000 April 1995 
> 14,590,000 January 1996 
> 14,600,000 April 1996 
> 14,620,000 November 1996 
> 14,730,000 April 2000 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "James Krysan" <jkrysan@sbcglobal.net>
> To: <largeformat@f32.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 11:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [LargeFormat] Bad Kodak Lens
> 
> 
> > Philip
> > Yes, it was the Symmar that gave a more contrasty
> > image.
> > I don't know the age but the shutter looks quite
> > recent. It is multicoated. The serial # is 14
> 173531;
> > perhaps someone understands that scheme well
> enough
> > date it.
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LargeFormat mailing list
> LargeFormat@f32.net
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat