[LargeFormat] BIgger I say! BIGGER!!

[Guy Glorieux]

Big, did you say, Craig?
You mean the real works?
With in-camera dodging, etc?
Hmmm...
Did you mean something like this:
http://pages.infinit.net/memfloue/wilder001.htm
Guy
P.S.  This is just a sneak preview...  More to come later on as I
organize the site and also add some of the 11x14 pics that go with it.
P.S.2 - Don't follow me, I'm lost...  Les' advice in his email is much
more relevant.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Koshyk" <craig@prairieview.ca>
To: <largeformat@f32.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: [LargeFormat] BIgger I say! BIGGER!!


> O.K.
>
> since it is a bit slow lately I guess I could ask for some old
> fashioned advice/opinions.
>
> Here's the deal.
>
> I got the large format bug....bad.
>
> I have two Sinar F 4x5's ....great studio cam's
>
> I have a 5x7 Kodak 2D....love it.
>
> I have a Deardorff 8x10...learning to love it.
>
> Now I have a hankering for something bigger. Something panoramic.
> Something in a fine 7x17, 8x20 or 12x20. BIG, baby, BIG!!
>
> So let's hear it folks. Which format should I choose and why? I have
> seen some awesome work in all of the above sizes (especially Dick
> Arentz's masterpieces and Kerik Kouklis's amazing prints) so I would
> probably be happy with any of them but I'd still like to hear what you
> all have to say.
>
> C'mon folks, give me both barrels!
>
> CK
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LargeFormat mailing list
> LargeFormat@f32.net
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat
>