[LargeFormat] Ultragon 210mm

largeformat@f32.net largeformat@f32.net
Mon Dec 23 02:28:08 2002


I would look for a good machine shop to do the hole for me.

lee
----- Original Message -----
From: "tripspud" <tripspud@transbay.net>
To: <largeformat@f32.net>
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: [LargeFormat] Ultragon 210mm


> Hi,
>
>      While a Schneider 210/8 is maybe overkill for 8x10 with 1/2
> meter image circle and the heft to go with it and the standard
> angulon provides little movement, I believe the newer Symmars,
> apo or something cover well at 210 and provide 5.6 aperture.
>
>      Or get a used WF Ektar.  Though there's no 210, there's
> 190 and 250 with the 250 having great coverage and the 190
> just managing at infinity.  BTW, I've managed to mount
> my WF Ektar 190 on the board for the modified Seneca 5x7.
> I was able to file it out of a smaller predrilled hole.  It took
> about 1 1/2 hours to do.  I was willing to spend the money
> to have a more pro job on it, but, like I couldn't find anyone
> locally to handle it.  This was kind of a surprise.  Well,
> anyway, this is the third lens I've managed to mount.  Maybe
> I should open up a shop.  :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rich Lahrson
> Berkeley, California
> tripspud@transbay.net
>
> Tim Atherton wrote:
>
> > > 210 mm for a wide angle for my 8x10.  I have been thinking about
getting a
> > > 210 mm G-Clarion because I know that it will cover with
> >
> > Some movements - see my posts about the G-Claron 210, and about the
great
> > little Kowa Graphic 210 f9
> >
> > Another option is the earlier version of the Fuji W 210 5.6  (single
coated
> > 58mm filter thread version) - that has about 352mm coverage at f 22, so
> > covers 8x10 with some movements too. I'm going to try one out soon and
see
> > how it does. They are usually reasonably priced, but can take a while to
> > find
> >
> > tim
> >
> > PS - if I find out I do really like the Kowa Graphic and it does all I
want,
> > I may think about selling the G-Claron elements - but I need to spend
some
> > time testing first.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LargeFormat mailing list
> > LargeFormat@f32.net
> > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LargeFormat mailing list
> LargeFormat@f32.net
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat