[Jacob-list] Opinion regarding "true Jacob"

Marguerite Van Beek pegvanbeek at msn.com
Tue Jun 3 13:09:57 EDT 2008


Linda

The sad part is he is. But my question is where do they get this opinion? It is not in the JSBA or JSC rule books.
I know some prefer markings some don't but it is acceptable trait. I wanted to find out who really feels this way in our association.

Peggy
----- Original Message -----
From: Linda<mailto:patchworkfibers at alltel.net>
To: Mark Essen<mailto:messen at socket.net> ; jacob-list<mailto:jacob-list at jacobsheep.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Jacob-list] Opinion regarding "true Jacob"


Very well said, Mark.

Peggy, I find it very disturbing that a Jacob breeder would say such a thing. I would have to think that it was not a breeder that belonged to either JSBA or JSC and certainly not one that ever registered.

Linda

www.patchworkfibers.com<http://www.patchworkfibers.com/>
Registered Jacob Sheep, Angora Rabbits, Handspun Yarn


> Are we competitive or cynical? I prefer to think that we are
> critical. Anytime we look at prospective new flock members we
> become very critical. My picture perfect Jacob has four bold
> symmetric horns with nice eye and muzzle patches to match the nice
> knee patches and random black spots all over the rest of the white
> petite body. I will not put a two horn or white legged Jacobs into
> my flock. But, this is just a critical preference of what I want
> in my flock. To claim that somebody else's sheep are impure or
> second class Jacobs for these reasons would just simply be wrong.
> People used to say the same things about red Angus and Holsteins.
> The other thing that we should all strive for (have to keep
> reminding myself of this) is we have to be diplomatic. My critical
> comments should never be spoken is such a way that they be taken as
> an insult. We also have to be thick skinned enough to forgive or
> ignore those that fail the diplomacy test.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Marguerite Van Beek
>> To: jacob-list
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:54 AM
>> Subject: [Jacob-list] Opinion regarding "true Jacob"
>>
>>
>> To all Jacob Breeders,.
>>
>> Do any of you think that a Jacob that does not have leg markings
>> is not a "true Jacob". That they are a crossbred. At the MSWF a
>> Jacob breeder approached some people that we looking and admiring
>> our flock can up to them started a conversation and stated that
>> our Jacobs are not "true Jacobs" because we have some that don't
>> have leg markings. I guess the gentlemen didn't know that my
>> daughter was standing right there when he said it.
>> Are we as a group becoming so critical in what consider a "true
>> Jacob" should be? I have full siblings in my flock where one has
>> leg marking and another does not. So, the one without is not a
>> true Jacob even thou he carriers that same gene pool as the one
>> that does. What is going on with our group? Last year it was
>> the two horn should be culled, this year it is the leg markings.
>> Gee, that would eliminate a lot of Jacobs. Is this the path we
>> are heading into. Have we become that competitive or cynical,
>> which is it?
>>
>> Peggy
>> Ridgecroft Farms
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jacob-list mailing list, sponsored by Swallow Lane Farm &
>> Fiberworks Jacob-list at jacobsheep.com
>> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/jacob-list<http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/jacob-list>
_______________________________________________
Jacob-list mailing list, sponsored by Swallow Lane Farm & Fiberworks
Jacob-list at jacobsheep.com
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/jacob-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/jacob-list/attachments/20080603/8de106ea/attachment.html>


More information about the Jacob-list mailing list