[AGL] Biden will pick Warren for VP

Michael Eisenstadt eisenstadt0 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 19 07:50:36 EDT 2020


I read about Stacey Abrams in Wikipedia. As a lawyer, politician, 
entrepreneur, author of chick-lit novels, she has had a more impressive 
career than I had imagined. She admits that she has no empirical 
evidence that she was gypped out of the governor's office, yet argues 
that if x number of voters had not been purged from the rolls, they 
would have voted for her (why?) and that she would have won the 
governorship of some Southern state. That sounds to me like an obsession 
that she should overcome and that she should stop being a sore loser and 
claiming that /she/ is the rightful governor. And yet and yet she still 
might be picked by Biden and some day wind up as the president of the 
US. OTOH, Biden already has the black vote sewed up so he doesn't need 
her for that reason. Abrams has all of her wits and is demonstrably 
capable in various capacities (lawyer, legislator in her state 
legislature, author of several chick-lit novels, innovator of various 
do-good projects) which is more than one can say about Biden.

On 3/18/2020 9:24 PM, Fontaine Maverick wrote:
> My god Frances, you don't like her gasping in between sentences? 
> That's not the kind of thing you often hear about male politicians. I 
> mean, everyone seems to have forgotten about sleepy Joes creepy 
> uninvited backrubs. I say that women can be petty mysogynists as much 
> as men can. (I have a bit of a bug up my own ass about Gretchen 
> Whitmers voice)
> Anyway, I agree that we shouldn't be taking these great women senators 
> out of the senate. But maybe we should have faith that the electorate 
> who put Warren, Klobuchar and Harris in office can
> do the job again.
> You all are gonna be appalled at this, but I think Stacey Abrams is 
> too black. I know, I know, it's a shameful thing to say but we have to 
> remember that a good one-third of this country abhorred the idea that 
> Barack Obama, that elegant cafe au lait man was our president, because 
> he wasn't sufficiently white. I want Abrams in the white house-I think 
> she is brilliant and charismatic and talented. I just don't think 
> enough people in this country would agree with me. Please tell me I am 
> wrong.
>
>
> Fontaine
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 18, 2020, 05:17:03 PM CDT, Frances Morey 
> <frances.morey at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Wow, Michael, for once I seem to agree with you politically. Warren 
> has some idiosyncrasies that are off putting--my pet peeve is how she 
> gasps in breath between sentences as if rushing to keep talking in 
> order not to be interrupted. But we need her in the senate so I hope 
> he will tap Stacey Abrams and let her do all the talking in campaign 
> stump speeches.He just needs to shut up and smile a lot.
> Best,
> Frances
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:13 PM Michael Eisenstadt 
> <eisenstadt0 at gmail.com <mailto:eisenstadt0 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 3/18/2020 2:03 PM, Carolyn wrote:
>     > John likes E Warren she has Ideals and and plans.
>     If only she were the prez candidate, Trump would be re-elected. As
>     it is
>     Trump is toast. The black ATT repair guy (for our landline) last week
>     said he knows Biden is gaga but will vote for him anyway. Most
>     successful blacks
>     like my repair guy are reasonably happy with government benefits.
>
>     To many, Warren is the most repulsive of the Dem. candidates, with a
>     hectoring
>     schoolmarm disposition. Women and radical liberal men attracted by
>     her
>     program
>     dont see how repulsive she is to normies.
>
>     Of course, Sanders would lose to Trump. His hand dance which
>     accompanies
>     his statements is idiosyncratic - I've never seen anything like
>     it. His
>     hands and fingers
>     describe arabesques in the air which are presumably meant to
>     authenticate the
>     statements. Odd nobody has commented on that bizarre phenomenon.
>     Probably
>     because commenting on it would evoke universal condemnation by the
>     POPC
>     (People of Political Correctness).
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/austin-ghetto-list/attachments/20200319/2b18ba8e/attachment.html>


More information about the Austin-ghetto-list mailing list