[AGL] Reles and Epstein, etc.

Frances Morey frances.morey at gmail.com
Fri Aug 16 12:34:15 EDT 2019


Jeffrey Epstein, the extreme narcissist, is not likely to have killed
himself.  The "facility" had a clean record until this event. Too many
people to keep this quiet in my opinion. But, hey, what do I know. There
were 50 witnesses scheduled to testify in the HSCA of congress looking into
the JFK assassination who died mysteriously before they were to testify.
Fifty is hardly coincidental! Yet there was hardly a stir over it.
Best,
Frances

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:24 AM Frances Morey <frances.morey at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I saw Dick DeGuerin on Thursday at Lonn Taylor's memorial in Fort Davis. I
> mentioned having just watched the HBO series, "The Jinx" about Robert
> Durst's volunteer documentary appearances which ended with his quote, "I
> killed them all."
> I asked if he was representing Durst in January when the CA trial begins.
> He said yes. Then I opined that it would be difficult to counter the
> on-screen confession. Yet, as Mike said, not impossible. DeGuerin smiled
> and said, "He should know."
> Best,
> Frances
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:24 AM Byron Allen Black <
> englishcorrection at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Here's what I found troubling:
>>
>>
>>    - The man was a convicted sex offender (a category I could certainly
>>    have been plunked into during those frivolous days at UT)
>>    - He was thus on the Sex Offender Registry, and had to go through all
>>    that rigmarole periodically
>>    - He continued to act illegally, in a flamboyant fashion
>>    - He explicitly involved very high-profile people in his escapades
>>    - He was finally apprehended, went through trial-by-media
>>    - He was incarcerated, pending trial
>>
>> After all of the above, is it likely he would suddenly feel abandoned, or
>> remorseful, or somehow that his entitled, wealthy, cynically elegant life
>> was not worth living? Which is to say, would he have committed suicide at
>> that point?
>>
>> It does not make sense from a psychological point of view. And the
>> likelihood of his 'being suicided' by one or more of his many celebrity
>> accomplices was extremely high. Everybody involved should have been aware
>> of this. Analogous to a turncoat mafiosi, preparing to testify.
>>
>> So why was there no real 'witness protection' (or in this case 'suspect
>> protection')?
>>
>> On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 05:45, James Holland <jholland123 at comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, one of those cops seems to have been under Lucky L'.s sway.  Or
>>> somebody's.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It was a given that the conspiracy theories would fly out like the
>>> demons from Pandora's box, but still…
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Must have been one hell of a party with Prince Andrew, Dershowitz, and
>>> George Mitchell all there, but aesthetically marginal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://pjmedia.com/trending/4-key-questions-must-be-answered-after-epstein-death-says-ben-sasse/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Austin-ghetto-list [mailto:
>>> austin-ghetto-list-bounces at pairlist.net] *On Behalf Of *Michael
>>> Eisenstadt
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 10, 2019 4:22 PM
>>> *To:* austin-ghetto-list at pairlist.net
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AGL] (no subject)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's a big bad world out there. Jeffery Epstein's suicide is very
>>> suspicious.
>>>
>>> 1) was he the type to commit suicide in his situation?
>>>
>>> 2) might he have implicated very important people as having trafficked
>>> with his underage women associates who might have taken steps that he say
>>> nothing?
>>>
>>> In 1941, a witness named Abe Reles about to testify against Albert
>>> Anastasia the Mafia boss of bosses in NYC, guarded by no less than 6 NYC
>>> policeman fell out of a window on the 6th floor of a hotel he was being
>>> held in. His testimony of course never took place.
>>>
>>> Mike e.
>>>
>>> On 8/10/2019 3:00 PM, James Holland wrote:
>>>
>>> "(actually another subscriber told me the same off list privately)"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm the other subscriber, and my reasons are pretty much the same as
>>> Mike's.  Trump is a blowhard and often a buffoon, but Hillary was
>>> unthinkable.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jim Holland
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Austin-ghetto-list [
>>> mailto:austin-ghetto-list-bounces at pairlist.net
>>> <austin-ghetto-list-bounces at pairlist.net>] *On Behalf Of *Michael
>>> Eisenstadt
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 10, 2019 9:53 AM
>>> *To:* austin-ghetto-list at pairlist.net
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AGL] (no subject)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I thought I was the only subscriber openly saying that I voted for
>>> Trump in 2016 (actually another subscriber told me the same off list
>>> privately).
>>>
>>> Mike eisenstadt
>>>
>>> On 8/10/2019 9:20 AM, Fontaine Maverick wrote:
>>>
>>> Who's flaking you? Besides Mike eisenstadt?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Fontaine
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, August 9, 2019, 08:02:35 AM CDT, Charles Loving
>>> <lovingigor at gmail.com> <lovingigor at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm.... Getting a lot of flack on these toons from closet Trumpistas.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:29 PM Frances Morey <frances.morey at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hawr!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 1:17 PM Charles Loving <lovingigor at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> TOON
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Charlie Loving
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Charlie Loving
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/austin-ghetto-list/attachments/20190816/f4221e9a/attachment.html>


More information about the Austin-ghetto-list mailing list