[AGL] Where we are now

[Michael Eisenstadt]

You didn't come out and say it but actually you do say it: the 
international law of Refugee status to anyone who claims it which was 
ratified by the US should be the rule, which is to say let in anyone who 
claims it and all the illegals are in fact claiming refugee status. You 
are FOR NO BORDER CONTROLS. You are a Goodwhite. The consequences of 
letting everyone in does not concern you - there's plenty of room, etc. 
Badwhites who live in the neighborhoods with the the illegals may choose 
to disagree. See ya' at the ballot box.


On 7/19/2019 11:42 AM, Frances Morey wrote:
> I am for processing them in to weed out criminal elements but we have 
> plenty of room for emergency immigrants, aka refugees. If we are full 
> up what is with all the anti-abortion rhetoric? Why aren't abortions 
> and birth control methods free?
> Best,
> Frances
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:44 AM Michael Eisenstadt 
> <mike.eisenstadt at gmail.com <mailto:mike.eisenstadt at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 7/19/2019 10:23 AM, Frances Morey wrote:
>     > The Democratic Party is not for "Open Borders" yet the people
>     who are
>     > refugees are coming from countries in which our economic
>     meddling have
>     > made them unlivable.
>
>     Double talk. Are you for letting them in or keeping them out? Don't
>     equivocate. Yes or no?
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/austin-ghetto-list/attachments/20190719/7cfddb9c/attachment.html>