[AGL] people of color?

[Frances Morey]

So if you minimize and eliminate his supporters statistically, how did he win the election? Could it be election fraud operating under the name Operation Cross Check? Yes, it could.
Now, about his Tweeting, Reader Supported News asked if the tweeting might be just a distraction? Another Yes!
Here's how I responded to that:"Yes, to the question posed, the tweets are a distraction from their nefarious attempts to pass laws to "satisfy the base." The Trump administration simply wants to dismantle the government. Trump and Bannon pretend to believe the people want elimination of taxation, deregulation of everything and cutting all social safety net programs. He speaks with a forked tongue. Nothing he says is credible.
Their true goal appears to be anarchy. Our nation, society and democracy, civilization itself, is only possible with voluntary compliance with the law. Trump has made a mockery of morality and the Rule of Law.
When a head of state commits treason the only hope lies in the judiciary. When the AG ignores the law, and only he or the president can name a Special Prosecutor this calls for a higher authority.
The only remaining branch of government that can take the initiative is SCOTUS. They should invoke the 25th Amendment, rule to delegitimize the election and declare Hillary Clinton president. Then an investigation can proceed under Special Prosecutor Merrick Garland whom they name.
Given their decision in the 2000 Election this would be a just demonstration of their commitment to the principle of equality in the eyes of the law."
Best,Frances

    On Sunday, March 5, 2017 6:44 PM, Kdoyle <kdoyle1 at austin.rr.com> wrote:
 

 
Thank you for recognizing my ingeniousness.
Yep, a mere  20%  of US white, eligible to vote, males voted for   donny, little hands, tweetler.     NOT   "63% of all white American men"  as you so happily misstated in your alternate fact presentation.  And the  80% who didn’t vote for him does not include ”criminals”, since felons  are not eligible to vote - if you include them there are even more white males who didn’t vote for him.
And now the number of those who voted for him who regret it or recognize they were duped, is increasing moment by moment. 
So I am glad glad glad that most men in the US did not vote for him, and never "supported him big time”- or even little time, and among the few who did, more are  coming to their senses. 
  BTW, The  white men in Mexico and Canada, who live on the North American continent  with us,  are also American,  and they didn’t vote for him either, so if you  include them under ”American” then the % of pro trump white  American males is minuscule. As it should be.
 


On Mar 4, 2017, at 9:09 PM, eisenstadt0 <eisenstadt0 at gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/4/2017 5:24 PM, Kdoyle wrote:

So saying 63% of white American men voted for him is erroneous. It is actually a very small percent of white men who voted for trump.  The vast majority (80%) of white men in the country did not vote for him.


Wow! That's an amazing and ingenious argument: All those white men who didn't vote (criminals, disaffected or lazy) are to be counted as not voting for Trump.





   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/austin-ghetto-list/attachments/20170306/ef7b3764/attachment.html>