[AGL] Snap out of it!

[michele mason]

Thank-you, Fontaine. I've just tried to delete and carry on as I have 
much to do w/o replying to the over-educated and completely unconnected 
to any common American, pompous twits entertaining each other. I've 
worked in an "hopeless" campaign, or 2. Kennedy was my first.

I thoroughly enjoyed last night.  I felt really good for "a change." 
And, if I'm still a bit worried and slightly anxious, its because I've 
lived our collective history, just as you have and there are good 
reasons to care very deeply for the outcome —and to have the courage to 
dream for a better place and time, and to work towards that dream. 
Nobody else is going to make it happen. We've done it before. We can do 
it again despite a couple of puffed-up intellectuals who never worried 
about a sick child, or had to feed anybody, but themselves. Today, 
China has not quite taken over the world and today is all we have.

Thanks again, michele

On Aug 26, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Fontaine Maverick wrote:


> This phrase reminded me of the scene in "Moonstruck" when Cher slapped 

> Nic Cage after he came unglued...

> It has occurred to me that we as a party are suffering from a kind of 

> political PTSD - and we just have to shake it off. I have been anxious 

> and worried, so I am thankful to Eugene Robinson for writing this.

>  

> The Worrywart Party

> __

>

> By Eugene Robinson

> Tuesday, August 26, 2008; A13

>

> DENVER -- If they want to win in November, Democrats have one task to 

> accomplish this week: Snap out of it.

>

> Somehow, tentativeness and insecurity have infected a party that ought 

> to be full of confident swagger. It's not that Democrats don't like 

> their odds of winning the presidency and boosting their majorities in 

> both houses of Congress. It's that they are even bothering to 

> calculate and recalculate those odds.

>

> That's what you could catch Democrats doing last weekend as they 

> assembled for the convention. We'll win, they would say, but we just 

> have to do this or Barack Obama just has to do that or the Clintons 

> have to do this, that and the other. And the stars have to align just 

> so.

>

> People, the stars don't line up any more auspiciously than this. 

> George W. Bush is to presidential unpopularity what Michael Phelps is 

> to aquatic velocity. The Republican candidate for president is a 

> wooden, uncharismatic denizen of Washington whose "maverick" image 

> belies the fact that he has supported Bush on practically every big 

> issue. The economy is sagging, the financial system is in crisis and 

> gasoline prices remain punishingly high. In recent polls, as many as 

> eight out of 10 Americans have said the country is on the wrong track. 

> You don't need a soothsayer to read omens like these.

>

> Since I landed here Saturday night, though, I haven't heard a lot of 

> Democrats crowing about the terrible whuppin' they're about to 

> administer. I've heard predictions of victory, yes, but also a lot of 

> questions. Will Hillary Clinton's die-hard supporters refuse to lay 

> down their arms, even if their champion begs them to? Will an 

> unreconciled Bill Clinton steal the show? Will Obama's acceptance 

> speech at Invesco Field be so stirring and poetic that the Republicans 

> will slam him again for excessive eloquence?

>

> In other words: Are Hillary Clinton's followers, many of whom care 

> deeply about women's issues, ready to accept a Supreme Court majority 

> that would do away with Roe v. Wade, which John McCain would surely 

> deliver? Has Bill Clinton forgotten everything he ever learned about 

> politics and forsaken his lifelong loyalty to the Democratic Party? 

> Would Obama be wise to effectively renounce the use of his great 

> oratorical gifts, which constitute one of his most powerful and 

> effective weapons?

>

> All these questions are just excuses to fret. Unlike Republicans, 

> Democrats like to obsess about what could go wrong. It's kind of a 

> partisan hobby.

>

> I was going to say that the Republican Party's hobby is driving 

> Democrats crazy with worry, but the truth is that the Democrats are 

> doing this to themselves.

>

> People here complain that the polls are too close for comfort, 

> forgetting that there is rarely anything comfortable about a 

> presidential contest. When was the last time a non-incumbent Democrat 

> cruised to the White House? Clinton, remember, won only a 43 percent 

> plurality of the popular vote in 1992. You have to go all the way back 

> to Franklin Roosevelt in 1932. Why would anyone think for a moment 

> that Obama could win this without a fight?

>

> I'm being somewhat unkind, because the truth is that the Democratic 

> Party has tried mightily this year to fight its depressive tendencies. 

> The party is even playing offense for a change, taking the fight to 

> McCain in states that used to be a forgone conclusion for the 

> Republicans. Here in Colorado, recent polls show Obama with a small 

> but significant lead; in Virginia, which hasn't gone Democratic since 

> 1964, the race is a dead heat.

>

> As for the Democratic states that McCain is trying to contest, 

> Democrats should take the advice of Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell. On 

> Saturday, as Joe Biden was being announced as Obama's running mate, 

> Rendell was asked how to keep his state in the Democratic column. His 

> answer, and I'm paraphrasing here, was to quit whining about it and 

> just go out and win the state. He helped the Clintons pummel Obama in 

> the primary, and he pronounced himself raring to help Obama and Biden 

> do the same to McCain in the general.

>

> Even with the fundamentals teed up and the stars smiling, winning the 

> White House was never going to be a walk in the park for any Democrat. 

> The party will have had a successful convention if, at the end of the 

> week, Democrats stop all the worrying and declare a moratorium on 

> second-guessing. Go shake some hands and kiss some babies.

>

> The writer's e-mail address is eugenerobinson at washpost.com. He'll be 

> live online to answer questions at 1 p.m. Read more from Eugene 

> Robinson at washingtonpost.com's new opinion blog, PostPartisan.

AS FOR ME  AND  MY HOUSE, WE SHALL SERVE THE LORD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 7079 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/austin-ghetto-list/attachments/20080828/ad8bf3ef/attachment.bin>