when did facts stop a good conspiracy theory ...yet again

[Pepi Plowman]

Reverend Bubba,

You know what truth is: each person's is different. 
What we see around us is maya, in any case.  My
percept tells me that the disparate realities we
experience on this earth do not gainsay the existence
of a certain balance, and that there exists a layer of
thin, light lines on which to traverse the abyss.  If
anything were hellish, it would be falling into dark
nothingness, down there in the void.

So how does one keep a balance in a world gone insane?

Look within, in silence.  Remember what Powell St.
John said. 

Her Highness Patricia Elaine
--- Clark Santos <clarksantos at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> On the other ghetto list there has been a going
> discussion of the facts 
> required for starting conspiracy arguments about all
> situations, so I 
> thought some rather obvious building techniques and
> political 
> connections needed to be highlighted. Hell I may
> start to write 
> documentary exposes, as soon as my typing skills get
> better on these 
> list practice sessions.
> 
> This list has been much quicker lately and if I am
> having trouble with 
> postings of some email I post to both.
> 
> Clark
> 
> On Jun 17, 2005, at 2:42 PM, Michael Eisenstadt
> wrote:
> 
> Clark,
> 
> Have you been to the WTC site? I did last summer. It
> had a relatively small footprint and was closely
> surrounded by highrise office buildings. When it
> came
> down it took out 2 of highrise office buildings with
> it and
> badly damaged another. You are just funning us to
> suggest that its designer put preinstalled
> explosives in
> two 100 storey buildings to blow them up (without
> anyone noticing of course during the 3 years it took
> to
> build them), you sly devil you.
> 
> Mike
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: Clark Santos
> To: Remembrances of Austin Ghetto ; survivors'
> reminiscences about 
> Austin Ghetto Daze in the 60s
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:05 PM
> Subject: Re: when did facts stop a good conspiracy
> theory ...yet again
> 
> 
> When you construct a building, thats the time you
> put everything in it 
> like toilets, sinks, wires, and lights because its
> much cheeper to do 
> it that way. I observed all these processes while
> working my way 
> through UT. Buildings are depreciated over a 30 year
> period in the 
> American way, so they probably installed the
> demolition charges and 
> network of implosion devises while erecting it to
> make it cheeper and 
> more efficient to get rid of the structure after it
> was used up.
> 
> This makes perfect sense, we all know Republicans
> are for world trade 
> and own or manage most of the large construction
> companies. Did Brown 
> and Root build the world trade center? Are you or
> your family working 
> in an efficient Republican constructed building?
> 
> Watch for the new book "COULD YOU PERISH IN CHANEY
> ORCHESTRATED HELL 
> FIRE" by the noted El Patron and sundry other
> experts. Soon at 
> bookstores everywhere.
> 
> 
> On Jun 17, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Wayne Smith wrote:
> 
> Yes and I agree except there is the theory that
> several women all 
> turned on their , at once and shook things up a bit.
>  Keep an open mind 
> is all I ask, keep an open mind ?.......w jr.
> 
> Wayne Johnson <revbubba at EVILLAGES.ORG> wrote:From
> the Conspiracy 
> website, the following "personal account" offered as
> 
> "proof".
> 
> 
> "Seconds before the South Tower crumbled to its
> doom, I heard/felt a
> series of explosions. Same with the North Tower.
> There was no denying 
> it,
> I could FEEL the vibrations of them like a small
> earthquake. Yet when I
> turned on the news none of the other eyewitnesses
> commented on this."
> 
> Great. Some "feels" vibrations and then "knows" that
> these Must Have 
> Been
> Caused by Explosive Devices! Stuff and nonsense. If
> you have mega-tonnes
> of structure beginning to fall, there would indeed
> by "vibrations" you
> could feel. Feet aren't exactly seismagraphs, and
> intuitions as to cause
> aren't exactly reasoned, scientific explanations.
> 
> This kind of extemporaneous gibberish passed off as
> some kind of "proof"
> just makes eveyone's job more difficult in the
> business of finding out
> what happened and, perhaps, the extent of any
> conspiracy to destroy and
> defraud. It is about as useful as seeing an image
> the Virgin Mary in 
> your
> skillet. It is utterly lacking in credibilty and is
> thus harmful to 
> anyone
> really interested in "truth". What the hell is Truth
> anyway?
> 
> Bush knows "Truth" becaue him talk to God him do.
> 
> fooey.
> 
> Rev. Bubba in a black mood
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > As Ewie says, "But since when did facts stop a
> good conspiracy theory."
> >
> > I couldn't agree more - those who really believe
> the wacko conspiracy
> > theory about 19 Arabs, armed with box cutters,
> hijacking jets and 
> > flying
> > them into buildings, will never be persuaded
> otherwise by mere facts!
> >
> > Those who even admit that Bush, Cheney, Rice, et.
> al. told naked lies 
> > in
> > the wake of the tragedy, still choose to believe
> the official story.
> >
> > There is a growing body of literature that
> explains such credulity in 
> > the
> > face of overwhelming evidence.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hear Leaseholder Larry Silverstein say they
> "pulled" WTC 7...
> >
> > More on the WTC-7 collapse
> >
> >
> >
> > Check out the WTC demolition archive ...
> >
> > http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/category.asp?id=46
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> <04.gif> Tha Screen Door Latch Is On The Outside,
> Y'all Come C  Us, Ya 
>
Hear..........................................<06.gif>
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
>