Think Big

[Stephanie Chernikowski]

--Apple-Mail-1-526742646
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	format=flowed


On Jun 27, 2004, at 9:23 AM, Wayne Johnson wrote:

> Jackson
> Pollack.
>

wouldn't have him any other way. or avedon. my point was that big is 
often just a way to be sure  you are looked at as art. saw a dreadful 
photo show of post-mapplethorpe flowers. the composition was stilted, 
lacking the grace of mapplethorpe. the artist had a rich husband so 
gigantic prints could be purchased from a lab (but what the heck, rm 
had a sugar daddy to foot the bill too). they  were not art or artful. 
they were boring, but hung in a fine art gallery. they were 
non-threatening and would go w/sofas, so were, i assume, profitable for 
the gallery.
have no problem w/big when it is worth the space. love serra's torqued 
ellipses, which are gigantic.




Stephanie Chernikowski
StepCherPhoto.com


--Apple-Mail-1-526742646
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=US-ASCII



On Jun 27, 2004, at 9:23 AM, Wayne Johnson wrote:


<excerpt>Jackson

Pollack.


</excerpt><fontfamily><param>Helvetica</param><smaller>

wouldn't have him any other way. or avedon. my point was that big is
often just a way to be sure  you are looked at as art. saw a dreadful
photo show of post-mapplethorpe flowers. the composition was stilted,
lacking the grace of mapplethorpe. the artist had a rich husband so
gigantic prints could be purchased from a lab (but what the heck, rm
had a sugar daddy to foot the bill too). they  were not art or artful.
they were boring, but hung in a fine art gallery. they were
non-threatening and would go w/sofas, so were, i assume, profitable
for the gallery. 

have no problem w/big when it is worth the space. love serra's torqued
ellipses, which are gigantic.





Stephanie Chernikowski

StepCherPhoto.com

</smaller></fontfamily>


--Apple-Mail-1-526742646--