Tits surgically enlarged...
Frances Morey
frances_morey@yahoo.com
Wed Feb 4 10:56:03 2004
--0-1062582145-1075910063=:9210
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Byron,
The poor thing, Janet, she just wasn't getting the attention brother Michael was, had to one up him. I think they are both capable of the most egregious publicity stunts unimaginable--his thinly veiled cat-that-ate-the-cream expression in the face of child molestation charges, and then her showing off a faux body part to a world-wide-super-bowl-audience for fun and profit. It's like Wag the Media. A script of this wouldn't be believable. Any media wagged by these twits is certainly suspect of journalistic misconduct or, in a kinder light, entertainment masquerading as news.
The public is also incomprehensibly facile with the hew and cry over "children seeing breasts on national television." Don't they see them up close and personal when feeding as infants? Isn't infant feeding what they're for? Last summer I heard a young woman describe surgically enhanced boobs as being butt-chested.
I saw "the event" again and again and didn't really take notice until seeing the attached still. When it happened it wasn' t all that obvious, so the media ran it again and again to call attention to it in every way, so we all must pay attention...
Aggggg,
Frances
blacky@cbn.net.id wrote:
Truly then 'tis the BOOB TUBE.
(Couldn't resist it. Stop me before I do it again)
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
> ATTACHMENT part 2 image/jpeg name=tit.jpg; type=Unknown
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
--0-1062582145-1075910063=:9210
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<DIV>Byron,</DIV>
<DIV>The poor thing, Janet, she just wasn't getting the attention brother Michael was, had to one up him. I think they are both capable of the most egregious publicity stunts unimaginable--his thinly veiled cat-that-ate-the-cream expression in the face of child molestation charges, and then her showing off a faux body part to a world-wide-super-bowl-audience for fun and profit. It's like Wag the Media. A script of this wouldn't be believable. Any media wagged by these twits is certainly suspect of journalistic misconduct or, in a kinder light, entertainment masquerading as news.</DIV>
<DIV>The public is also incomprehensibly facile with the hew and cry over "children seeing breasts on national television." Don't they see them up close and personal when feeding as infants? Isn't infant feeding what they're for? Last summer I heard a young woman describe surgically enhanced boobs as being butt-chested.</DIV>
<DIV>I saw "the event" again and again and didn't really take notice until seeing the attached still. When it happened it wasn' t all that obvious, so the media ran it again and again to call attention to it in every way, so we all must pay attention...</DIV>
<DIV>Aggggg,</DIV>
<DIV>Frances<BR><BR><B><I>blacky@cbn.net.id</I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Truly then 'tis the BOOB TUBE.<BR><BR>(Couldn't resist it. Stop me before I do it again)<BR><BR>BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB<BR><BR><BR>> ATTACHMENT part 2 image/jpeg name=tit.jpg; type=Unknown<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=21608/*http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/"><b>Try it!</b></a>
--0-1062582145-1075910063=:9210--