And then Colin Powell said, "I'm not reading this. This is $%&*#."

Linda Wetherby ljwetherby@austin.rr.com
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:42:57 -0500


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C32A96.D3317280
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0023_01C32A96.D3317280"


------=_NextPart_001_0023_01C32A96.D3317280
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bomb and SwitchEven Powell is sick of this shit!  x L



http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/04/opinion/04DOWD.html?pagewanted=3Dprint&=
position=3D



-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------


      =20

-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-

      June 4, 2003
      Bomb and Switch
      By MAUREEN DOWD

          =20
      ASHINGTON

      Before 9/11, the administration had too little intelligence on Al =
Qaeda, badly coordinated by clashing officials.

      Before the Iraq invasion, the administration had too much =
intelligence on Saddam, torqued up by conspiring officials.

      As Secretary of State Colin Powell prepared to make his case for =
invading Iraq to the U.N. on Feb. 5, a friend of his told me, he had to =
throw out a couple of hours' worth of sketchy intelligence other Bush =
officials were trying to stuff into his speech.

      U.S. News & World Report reveals this week that when Mr. Powell =
was rehearsing the case with two dozen officials, he became so =
frustrated by the dubious intelligence about Saddam that he tossed =
several pages in the air and declared: "I'm not reading this. This is =
$%&*#."

      First America has no intelligence. Then it has $%&*# intelligence.

      So this is progress?

      For the first time in history, America is searching for the reason =
we went to war after the war is over.

      As The Times's James Risen reports, a bedrock of the =
administration's weapons case - the National Intelligence Estimate that =
concluded that Iraq had chemical and biological weapons and was seeking =
nukes - is itself being reassessed. The document is at the center of a =
broad prewar-intelligence review, being conducted by the C.I.A. to see =
whether the weapons evidence was cooked.

      Conservatives are busily offering a bouquet of new justifications =
for a pre-emptive attack on Iraq that was sold as self-defense against =
Saddam's poised and thrumming weapons of mass destruction.

      Pressed by reporters about whether Tony Blair and President Bush =
were guilty of hyperbole - Mr. Blair's foreign secretary claimed Saddam =
could deploy chemical and biological weapons in 45 minutes - Senator =
John McCain replied, "The American people support what the president =
did, whether we find those weapons or not, and they did so the day they =
saw 9- and 10-year-old boys coming out of a prison in Baghdad."

      Senator Pete Domenici noted that experts thought that Saddam's =
overthrow might pave the way for the Middle East road map to work. "For =
those kind of experts to say that has changed the dynamics in the Middle =
East, sufficient that we might get peace, seems to me to outweigh all =
the questions about did we have every bit of evidence that we say we had =
or not," he said.=20

      In a Vanity Fair interview, Paul Wolfowitz said another "almost =
unnoticed but huge" reason for war was to promote Middle East peace by =
allowing the U.S. to take its troops out of Saudi Arabia - Osama's =
b=EAte noir. But it was after the U.S. announced it would pull its =
troops from Saudi Arabia that a resurgent Qaeda struck a Western =
compound, killing eight Americans.

      And it was after the U.S. tried to intimidate other foes by =
stomping on Saddam that Iran and North Korea ratcheted up their nukes. =
Iran and North Korea actually do have scary nuclear programs, but if we =
express our alarm to the world now, will we be accused of crying =
Wolfowitz?

      A new Pew survey of 21 nations shows a deepening skepticism toward =
the U.S. "The war had widened the rift between Americans and Western =
Europeans, further inflamed the Muslim world, softened support for the =
war on terrorism, and significantly weakened global public support for =
the pillars of the post-World War II era - the U.N. and the North =
Atlantic alliance," said Pew's director, Andrew Kohut.

      Brits may be more upset with Mr. Blair than Americans are with Mr. =
Bush because they have the quaint idea that even if you think war was a =
good idea, you should level with the public about your objectives.

      The Bush crowd practiced bait and switch, leaving many Americans =
with the impression that Saddam was involved in 9/11.

      When James Woolsey, the former C.I.A. director and current =
Pentagon adviser, appeared on "Nightline" five days after 9/11 and =
suggested that America had to strike Iraq for sponsoring terrorism, Ted =
Koppel rebutted: "Nobody right now is suggesting that Iraq had anything =
to do with this. In fact, quite the contrary."

      Mr. Woolsey replied: "I don't think it matters. I don't think it =
matters." The Republicans will have to follow the maxim of Robert Moses, =
the autocratic New York builder who never let public opinion get in the =
way of his bulldozing: "If the ends don't justify the means, what does?" =
=20







      Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy =
| Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top =20


------=_NextPart_001_0023_01C32A96.D3317280
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Bomb and Switch</TITLE>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff leftMargin=3D4 link=3D#000066 topMargin=3D4 =
vLink=3D#444464>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">
<DIV>Even Powell is sick of this shit!&nbsp; x L</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/04/opinion/04DOWD.html?pagewanted=3D=
print&amp;position=3D">http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/04/opinion/04DOWD.h=
tml?pagewanted=3Dprint&amp;position=3D</A><BR>
<P>
<HR>

<P></P><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 =
Transitional//EN"/><!--Knews2 Document -->
<SCRIPT language=3DJavaScript>
if (document.layers) {
document.write("<link rel=3D'stylesheet' type=3D'text/css'  =
href=3D'http://www.nytimes.com/css/article.ns.css'>");
}
else {
document.write("<link rel=3D'stylesheet' type=3D'text/css'  =
href=3D'http://www.nytimes.com/css/article.css'>");
}
</SCRIPT>

<SCRIPT language=3DJavaScript>
<!--
=20
=09
    function nameIt() {
    	window.name =3D 'nytimesmain';
    }
    =20
	function pop_me_up(pURL,features){=20
		new_window =3D window.open(pURL, "popup_window", features);
		new_window.focus();
	}

	function pop_me_up2(pURL,name,features){
		new_window =3D window.open(pURL,name,features);
		new_window.focus();
	}

	function changeImage(image_name,image_src) {
   		document.images[image_name].src =3D image_src;
	}

	function goToURL(obj){
		var f =3D (obj.section) ? obj : obj.form;
		var selected =3D f.section.selectedIndex;
		var URL =3D f.section.options[selected].value;
		if (URL !=3D "") document.location =3D URL;
		return false;
	}

	if (window.self !=3D window.top) {=20
		top.location.replace(window.location.pathname);=20
	}

//-->
</SCRIPT>

<META content=3Diso-8859-1 http-equiv=3Dcharset>
<META content=3D"Bomb and Switch" name=3DNYT_HEADLINE>
<META content=3D"Bomb and Switch" name=3Dhdl>
<META content=3D"By MAUREEN DOWD" name=3DBY_LINE>
<META content=3D"By MAUREEN DOWD" name=3Dbyl>
<META=20
content=3D" For the first time in history, America is searching for the =
reason we went to war after the war is over. "=20
name=3DFIRSTPAR>
<META=20
content=3D" For the first time in history, America is searching for the =
reason we went to war after the war is over. "=20
name=3Dlp>
<META content=3DOpinion name=3DSECTION>
<META content=3D"" name=3DSUBSECTION>
<META content=3D"The New York Times" name=3DSOURCE>
<META content=3D"The New York Times" name=3Dcre>
<META content=3D"June 4, 2003" name=3DDISPLAYDATE>
<META content=3D20030604 name=3Dpdate><!--Times index meta tags -->
<META content=3D"" name=3Dttl>
<META content=3D"" name=3Dvirtloc>
<META=20
content=3D"United States Armament and Defense;United States =
International Relations"=20
name=3Ddes>
<META content=3D"" name=3Dper>
<META content=3D"" name=3Dorg>
<META content=3DIraq name=3Dgeo>
<META content=3D"" name=3Dticker><!--New meta tags -->
<META content=3D"June 4, 2003" name=3Ddat>
<META content=3DOp-Ed name=3Dtom>
<META content=3D"" name=3Dcat>
<META content=3D"Op-Ed Columnist" name=3Dcol>
<META content=3D500 name=3DARTICLE_TEMPLATE_VERSION>
<META content=3DOpinion name=3Ddsk><!-- FORCETAGS =
TopAd,MiddleRight,Travel9,Frame4,Right4 --><!-- ADX SETUP: page: =
www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/opinion/04DOWD.html positions: =
Middle1,Bottom1A,Bottom3A,Inv1,Inv2,TopAd,MiddleRight,Travel9,Frame4,Righ=
t4 kwds: =
united+states+armament+and+defense;united+states+international+relations;=
iraq;suggested%5fpolitics;suggested%5fopinion;suggested%5fnational;sugges=
ted%5finternational -->
<META content=3DNOARCHIVE name=3DROBOTS>
<TABLE border=3D0 cellPadding=3D0 cellSpacing=3D0 width=3D"100%">
  <TBODY>
  <TR>
    <TD align=3Dleft vAlign=3Dtop><IMG align=3Dleft alt=3D"The New York =
Times"=20
      border=3D0 hspace=3D0=20
      =
src=3D"http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/misc/logoprinter.gif"><!-- =
context ad reference Position1 -->=20
      <BR clear=3Dall>
      <HR align=3Dleft SIZE=3D1>

      <H5>June 4, 2003</H5><NYT_HEADLINE type=3D" " version=3D"1.0">
      <H2>Bomb and Switch</H2></NYT_HEADLINE><NYT_BYLINE type=3D" "=20
      version=3D"1.0"><FONT size=3D-1><STRONG>By MAUREEN=20
      DOWD</STRONG></FONT><BR><BR></NYT_BYLINE>
      <TABLE align=3Dright border=3D0 cellPadding=3D0 cellSpacing=3D0>
        <TBODY>
        <TR>
          <TD></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><NYT_TEXT>
      <P><IMG align=3Dleft alt=3DW border=3D0=20
      =
src=3D"http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/dropcap/w.gif">ASHINGTON</P>
      <P>Before 9/11, the administration had too little intelligence on =
Al=20
      Qaeda, badly coordinated by clashing officials.</P>
      <P>Before the Iraq invasion, the administration had too much =
intelligence=20
      on Saddam, torqued up by conspiring officials.</P>
      <P>As Secretary of State Colin Powell prepared to make his case =
for=20
      invading Iraq to the U.N. on Feb. 5, a friend of his told me, he =
had to=20
      throw out a couple of hours' worth of sketchy intelligence other =
Bush=20
      officials were trying to stuff into his speech.</P>
      <P>U.S. News &amp; World Report reveals this week that when Mr. =
Powell was=20
      rehearsing the case with two dozen officials, he became so =
frustrated by=20
      the dubious intelligence about Saddam that he tossed several pages =
in the=20
      air and declared: "I'm not reading this. This is $%&amp;*#."</P>
      <P>First America has no intelligence. Then it has $%&amp;*#=20
      intelligence.</P>
      <P>So this is progress?</P>
      <P>For the first time in history, America is searching for the =
reason we=20
      went to war after the war is over.</P>
      <P>As The Times's James Risen reports, a bedrock of the =
administration's=20
      weapons case &#8212; the National Intelligence Estimate that =
concluded that Iraq=20
      had chemical and biological weapons and was seeking nukes &#8212; =
is itself=20
      being reassessed. The document is at the center of a broad=20
      prewar-intelligence review, being conducted by the C.I.A. to see =
whether=20
      the weapons evidence was cooked.</P>
      <P>Conservatives are busily offering a bouquet of new =
justifications for a=20
      pre-emptive attack on Iraq that was sold as self-defense against =
Saddam's=20
      poised and thrumming weapons of mass destruction.</P>
      <P>Pressed by reporters about whether Tony Blair and President =
Bush were=20
      guilty of hyperbole &#8212; Mr. Blair's foreign secretary claimed =
Saddam could=20
      deploy chemical and biological weapons in 45 minutes &#8212; =
Senator John McCain=20
      replied, "The American people support what the president did, =
whether we=20
      find those weapons or not, and they did so the day they saw 9- and =

      10-year-old boys coming out of a prison in Baghdad."</P>
      <P>Senator Pete Domenici noted that experts thought that Saddam's=20
      overthrow might pave the way for the Middle East road map to work. =
"For=20
      those kind of experts to say that has changed the dynamics in the =
Middle=20
      East, sufficient that we might get peace, seems to me to outweigh =
all the=20
      questions about did we have every bit of evidence that we say we =
had or=20
      not," he said. </P>
      <P>In a Vanity Fair interview, Paul Wolfowitz said another "almost =

      unnoticed but huge" reason for war was to promote Middle East =
peace by=20
      allowing the U.S. to take its troops out of Saudi Arabia &#8212; =
Osama's b=EAte=20
      noir. But it was after the U.S. announced it would pull its troops =
from=20
      Saudi Arabia that a resurgent Qaeda struck a Western compound, =
killing=20
      eight Americans.</P>
      <P>And it was after the U.S. tried to intimidate other foes by =
stomping on=20
      Saddam that Iran and North Korea ratcheted up their nukes. Iran =
and North=20
      Korea actually do have scary nuclear programs, but if we express =
our alarm=20
      to the world now, will we be accused of crying Wolfowitz?</P>
      <P>A new Pew survey of 21 nations shows a deepening skepticism =
toward the=20
      U.S. "The war had widened the rift between Americans and Western=20
      Europeans, further inflamed the Muslim world, softened support for =
the war=20
      on terrorism, and significantly weakened global public support for =
the=20
      pillars of the post-World War II era &#8212; the U.N. and the =
North Atlantic=20
      alliance," said Pew's director, Andrew Kohut.</P>
      <P>Brits may be more upset with Mr. Blair than Americans are with =
Mr. Bush=20
      because they have the quaint idea that even if you think war was a =
good=20
      idea, you should level with the public about your objectives.</P>
      <P>The Bush crowd practiced bait and switch, leaving many =
Americans with=20
      the impression that Saddam was involved in 9/11.</P>
      <P>When James Woolsey, the former C.I.A. director and current =
Pentagon=20
      adviser, appeared on "Nightline" five days after 9/11 and =
suggested that=20
      America had to strike Iraq for sponsoring terrorism, Ted Koppel =
rebutted:=20
      "Nobody right now is suggesting that Iraq had anything to do with =
this. In=20
      fact, quite the contrary."</P>
      <P>Mr. Woolsey replied: "I don't think it matters. I don't think =
it=20
      matters." The Republicans will have to follow the maxim of Robert =
Moses,=20
      the autocratic New York builder who never let public opinion get =
in the=20
      way of his bulldozing: "If the ends don't justify the means, what=20
      does?"&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR><BR><BR><BR></P></NYT_TEXT><BR>
      <CENTER><NYT_COPYRIGHT><A class=3Dfooter=20
      href=3D"/ref/membercenter/help/copyright.html">Copyright =
2003</A>&nbsp;<A=20
      class=3Dfooter href=3D"http://www.nytco.com/">The New York Times =
Company</A> |=20
      <A class=3Dfooter href=3D"http://www.nytimes.com/">Home</A> | <A =
class=3Dfooter=20
      =
href=3D"http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/privacy.html">Privac=
y=20
      Policy</A> | <A class=3Dfooter=20
      href=3D"http://query.nytimes.com/search/advanced/">Search</A> | <A =

      class=3Dfooter=20
      href=3D"http://www.nytimes.com/corrections.html">Corrections</A> | =
<A=20
      class=3Dfooter=20
      =
href=3D"http://www.nytimes.com/membercenter/sitehelp.html">Help</A> | <A =

      class=3Dfooter href=3D"#top">Back to Top</A>=20
  </NYT_COPYRIGHT></CENTER></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- removed =
reference to Bottom7 which was not in setup tag --><!-- context ad =
reference Inv1 --><!-- context ad reference Inv2 --><!-- removed =
reference to Inv3 which was not in setup tag --></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_001_0023_01C32A96.D3317280--

------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C32A96.D3317280
Content-Type: text/html;
	name="04DOWD.html"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="04DOWD.html"








<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"/>
<html>
<head>
<!--Knews2 Document -->
<script language=3D"JavaScript">
if (document.layers) {
document.write("<link rel=3D'stylesheet' type=3D'text/css'  =
href=3D'http://www.nytimes.com/css/article.ns.css'>");
}
else {
document.write("<link rel=3D'stylesheet' type=3D'text/css'  =
href=3D'http://www.nytimes.com/css/article.css'>");
}
</script>
<script language=3D"JavaScript">
<!--
=20
=09
    function nameIt() {
    	window.name =3D 'nytimesmain';
    }
    =20
	function pop_me_up(pURL,features){=20
		new_window =3D window.open(pURL, "popup_window", features);
		new_window.focus();
	}

	function pop_me_up2(pURL,name,features){
		new_window =3D window.open(pURL,name,features);
		new_window.focus();
	}

	function changeImage(image_name,image_src) {
   		document.images[image_name].src =3D image_src;
	}

	function goToURL(obj){
		var f =3D (obj.section) ? obj : obj.form;
		var selected =3D f.section.selectedIndex;
		var URL =3D f.section.options[selected].value;
		if (URL !=3D "") document.location =3D URL;
		return false;
	}

	if (window.self !=3D window.top) {=20
		top.location.replace(window.location.pathname);=20
	}

//-->
</script>
<meta  http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html"><meta  =
http-equiv=3D"charset" content=3D"iso-8859-1">
<meta  name=3D"NYT_HEADLINE" content=3D"Bomb and Switch">
<meta  name=3D"hdl" content=3D"Bomb and Switch">
<meta  name=3D"BY_LINE" content=3D"By MAUREEN DOWD">
<meta  name=3D"byl" content=3D"By MAUREEN DOWD">
<meta  name=3D"FIRSTPAR" content=3D" For the first time in history, =
America is searching for the reason we went to war after the war is =
over. ">
<meta  name=3D"lp" content=3D" For the first time in history, America is =
searching for the reason we went to war after the war is over. ">
<meta  name=3D"SECTION" content=3D"Opinion">
<meta  name=3D"SUBSECTION" content=3D"">
<meta  name=3D"SOURCE" content=3D"The New York Times">
<meta  name=3D"cre" content=3D"The New York Times">
<meta   name=3D"DISPLAYDATE" content=3D"June 4, 2003">
<meta   name=3D"pdate" content=3D"20030604">
<!--Times index meta tags -->
<meta   name=3D"ttl" content=3D"">=20
<meta   name=3D"virtloc" content=3D"">
<meta   name=3D"des" content=3D"United States Armament and =
Defense;United States International Relations">
<meta   name=3D"per" content=3D"">
<meta   name=3D"org" content=3D"">
<meta   name=3D"geo" content=3D"Iraq">
<meta   name=3D"ticker" content=3D"">
<!--New meta tags -->
<meta   name=3D"dat" content=3D"June 4, 2003">
<meta   name=3D"tom" content=3D"Op-Ed">
<meta   name=3D"cat" content=3D"">
<meta   name=3D"col" content=3D"Op-Ed Columnist">
<meta  NAME=3D"ARTICLE_TEMPLATE_VERSION" CONTENT=3D"500">=20
<meta  name=3D"dsk" content=3D"Opinion">
<!-- FORCETAGS TopAd,MiddleRight,Travel9,Frame4,Right4 -->
<!-- ADX SETUP: page: www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/opinion/04DOWD.html =
positions: =
Middle1,Bottom1A,Bottom3A,Inv1,Inv2,TopAd,MiddleRight,Travel9,Frame4,Righ=
t4 kwds: =
united+states+armament+and+defense;united+states+international+relations;=
iraq;suggested%5fpolitics;suggested%5fopinion;suggested%5fnational;sugges=
ted%5finternational --><meta  name=3D"ROBOTS" content=3D"NOARCHIVE">
<title>Bomb and Switch</title>
</head>

   =20


<body bgcolor=3D"#ffffff" vlink=3D"#444464" link=3D"#000066"=20
 marginheight=3D"4" marginwidth=3D"4" topmargin=3D"4" leftmargin=3D"4">

<table border=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0" width=3D"100%">
<tr> <td align=3D"left" valign=3D"top">

<img src=3D"http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/misc/logoprinter.gif" =
align=3D"left" alt=3D"The New York Times" border=3D"0" hspace=3D"0" =
vspace=3D"0"><!-- context ad reference Position1 -->
<br clear=3D"all"><hr size=3D"1" align=3D"left">
<h5>June 4, 2003</h5>
<NYT_HEADLINE  version=3D"1.0" type=3D" "><h2>Bomb and =
Switch</h2></NYT_HEADLINE>
<NYT_BYLINE  version=3D"1.0" type=3D" "><font size=3D"-1"><strong>By =
MAUREEN DOWD</strong></font><br><br></NYT_BYLINE>
<table align=3D"right" border=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0">
  <tr><td>=20
  </td></tr>
</table>
<NYT_TEXT>
<P> <IMG SRC=3D"http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/dropcap/w.gif" =
BORDER=3D"0" ALIGN=3D"left" ALT=3D"W">ASHINGTON</p>
<P> Before 9/11, the administration had too little intelligence on Al =
Qaeda, badly coordinated by clashing officials.</p>
<P> Before the Iraq invasion, the administration had too much =
intelligence on Saddam, torqued up by conspiring officials.</p>
<P> As Secretary of State Colin Powell prepared to make his case for =
invading Iraq to the U.N. on Feb. 5, a friend of his told me, he had to =
throw out a couple of hours' worth of sketchy intelligence other Bush =
officials were trying to stuff into his speech.</p>
<P> U.S. News & World Report reveals this week that when Mr. Powell was =
rehearsing the case with two dozen officials, he became so frustrated by =
the dubious intelligence about Saddam that he tossed several pages in =
the air and declared: "I'm not reading this. This is $%&*#."</p>
<P> First America has no intelligence. Then it has $%&*# =
intelligence.</p>
<P> So this is progress?</p>
<P> For the first time in history, America is searching for the reason =
we went to war after the war is over.</p>
<P> As The Times's James Risen reports, a bedrock of the =
administration's weapons case =97 the National Intelligence Estimate =
that concluded that Iraq had chemical and biological weapons and was =
seeking nukes =97 is itself being reassessed. The document is at the =
center of a broad prewar-intelligence review, being conducted by the =
C.I.A. to see whether the weapons evidence was cooked.</p>
<P> Conservatives are busily offering a bouquet of new justifications =
for a pre-emptive attack on Iraq that was sold as self-defense against =
Saddam's poised and thrumming weapons of mass destruction.</p>
<P> Pressed by reporters about whether Tony Blair and President Bush =
were guilty of hyperbole =97 Mr. Blair's foreign secretary claimed =
Saddam could deploy chemical and biological weapons in 45 minutes =97 =
Senator John McCain replied, "The American people support what the =
president did, whether we find those weapons or not, and they did so the =
day they saw 9- and 10-year-old boys coming out of a prison in =
Baghdad."</p>
<P> Senator Pete Domenici noted that experts thought that Saddam's =
overthrow might pave the way for the Middle East road map to work. "For =
those kind of experts to say that has changed the dynamics in the Middle =
East, sufficient that we might get peace, seems to me to outweigh all =
the questions about did we have every bit of evidence that we say we had =
or not," he said. </p>
<P> In a Vanity Fair interview, Paul Wolfowitz said another "almost =
unnoticed but huge" reason for war was to promote Middle East peace by =
allowing the U.S. to take its troops out of Saudi Arabia =97 Osama's =
b=EAte noir. But it was after the U.S. announced it would pull its =
troops from Saudi Arabia that a resurgent Qaeda struck a Western =
compound, killing eight Americans.</p>
<P> And it was after the U.S. tried to intimidate other foes by stomping =
on Saddam that Iran and North Korea ratcheted up their nukes. Iran and =
North Korea actually do have scary nuclear programs, but if we express =
our alarm to the world now, will we be accused of crying Wolfowitz?</p>
<P> A new Pew survey of 21 nations shows a deepening skepticism toward =
the U.S. "The war had widened the rift between Americans and Western =
Europeans, further inflamed the Muslim world, softened support for the =
war on terrorism, and significantly weakened global public support for =
the pillars of the post-World War II era =97 the U.N. and the North =
Atlantic alliance," said Pew's director, Andrew Kohut.</p>
<P> Brits may be more upset with Mr. Blair than Americans are with Mr. =
Bush because they have the quaint idea that even if you think war was a =
good idea, you should level with the public about your objectives.</p>
<P> The Bush crowd practiced bait and switch, leaving many Americans =
with the impression that Saddam was involved in 9/11.</p>
<P> When James Woolsey, the former C.I.A. director and current Pentagon =
adviser, appeared on "Nightline" five days after 9/11 and suggested that =
America had to strike Iraq for sponsoring terrorism, Ted Koppel =
rebutted: "Nobody right now is suggesting that Iraq had anything to do =
with this. In fact, quite the contrary."</p>
<P> Mr. Woolsey replied: "I don't think it matters. I don't think it =
matters." The Republicans will have to follow the maxim of Robert Moses, =
the autocratic New York builder who never let public opinion get in the =
way of his bulldozing: "If the ends don't justify the means, what =
does?"=A0=A0<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> </p>


</NYT_TEXT>
<br>
<center>
<NYT_COPYRIGHT>
<a href=3D"/ref/membercenter/help/copyright.html" =
class=3D"footer">Copyright 2003</a>&nbsp;<a =
href=3D"http://www.nytco.com/" class=3D"footer">The New York Times =
Company</a> |=20
<a href=3D"http://www.nytimes.com/" class=3D"footer">Home</a> | <a =
href=3D"http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/privacy.html" =
class=3D"footer">Privacy Policy</a> | <a =
href=3D"http://query.nytimes.com/search/advanced/" =
class=3D"footer">Search</a> | <a =
href=3D"http://www.nytimes.com/corrections.html" =
class=3D"footer">Corrections</a> | <a =
href=3D"http://www.nytimes.com/membercenter/sitehelp.html" =
class=3D"footer">Help</a> | <a href=3D"#top" class=3D"footer">Back to =
Top</a>
</NYT_COPYRIGHT>
</center>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>

</body>

<!-- removed reference to Bottom7 which was not in setup tag -->
</html>
<!-- context ad reference Inv1 -->

<!-- context ad reference Inv2 -->

<!-- removed reference to Inv3 which was not in setup tag -->

------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C32A96.D3317280--