Value Squandered (Was value added - long and acidic)
Jon Ford
jonmfordster@hotmail.com
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:57:33 -0800
Thanks, Jim, you saved me the energy of responding directly to this guy. As
for value added, I notice Bob left out some of Monsanto's "value added"
experiments now in the process of being banned in Europe but screwing up the
ability of many farmers around the world to keep their own seeds, forcing
them to rely on the patented seeds from the conglomerate. And the beat goes
on!
Jon
>From: "Jim Baldauf" <jfbaldauf@prodigy.net>
>To: "telebob x" <telebob98@hotmail.com>, <austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net>
>Subject: Value Squandered (Was value added - long and acidic)
>Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 23:18:26 -0600
>
>
>Bob wrote:
>
> >Here's only one "value added" schema...<
>
>(and)
>
> >Whatever our flaws, and whatever crimes we have committed
>against the world, they shrink before the success of mere free
>markets and democracy...<
>
>You are joking aren't you, Bob?
>"Value added," indeed!
>More like "value squandered," when
>you consider the net energy sink all this
>represents.
>"Success of mere free markets and democracy.."?
>Gimme a break!
>
>Love & Peace
>jb
>
>
>
>
>OK Jon-
>
>Here's only one "value added" schema to illuminate my argument-
>
>Product Exported from USA- Corn 2.5 billion bushels exported
>(This corn is fertilized by imported nitrogen)
>
>
>In today's global market, the economic success of the entire agricultural
>sector depends on international trade. One of every five rows of corn grown
>in the United States goes overseas. The USA also exports 'value-added' corn
>products such as meat, dairy and poultry products, corn gluten feed,
>plastics and corn syrup. There is no other sector of the U.S. economy where
>the link between trade and prosperity is clearer than in agriculture.
>
>NITROGEN
>Ammonia
>Most of the traded ammonia is used to manufacture fertilizers but
>considerable quantities are used to produce industrial chemicals. Between
>1986/88 and 1996/98 world ammonia trade increased from 8.2 to 11.2 million
>tonnes N.
>The main ammonia exporting regions in the 1996 to 1998 period were the FSU
>(36% of world trade), Trinidad, Mexico and Venezuela (19%), the Near East
>(12%).
>The main importers were West Europe, the USA, and certain Asian countries.
>Etc etc
>****************************************************************************
>********************
>There are literally 1000's of products manufactured in the US by US
>companies utilizing raw materials and energy imported from the rest of the
>world. Should I mention (Boeing) aircraft, machine tools, electronics,
>petrochemicals, steel products, and so on ad infinitum? There is 'value
>added' in every one of these products.
>
>This is not to say that people in the United States do not receive a
>disproportionate amount of the world's goods and services. We are rich.
>We
>should be. We have worked hard, and we work smart. We live in comfort
>compared to many cultures in the rest of the world. However, if you have
>spent much time in Western Europe, you can see that comfort and riches are
>hardly confined to the North American continent. We (and the Europeans)
>use
>the energy of the world to create products that are sold back to the world
>at ..yes A PROFIT.. so shocking. (But not unusual to see that we use an
>disproportionate amount of energy and materials to create these products.)
>
>Jon you seem to find that to be offensive. Even more, you seem to resent
>the
>success that the USA has enjoyed over the last 200 years and feel that our
>success is built on the bones of crushed economies and the labor of the
>oppressed in world sweatshops..
>
>Well Jon it just isn't true. Whatever our flaws, and whatever crimes we
>have committed against the world, they shrink before the success of mere
>free markets and democracy. It is not a zero sum game. Our labor,
>capital,
>and ingenuity have created this wealth. It is not wealth that had to be
>'stolen' from others. (Though 'we' did have to take the continent from the
>Native Americans..but I am sure the Neanderthals resented the rise of
>modern
>Homo Sapiens too.) The Marxist paradigm has been shown to be empirically
>vacant. Marx was good at describing inequities and the flaws of
>socio/economic models, but his solutions were naïve in the extreme and
>ultimately wrong.as proven in the laboratory of experience. You seem to be
>forgetting that.
>
>So you can call my "value added" comment "infamous" but I will be happy to
>stand behind it any day, and yes, you can say I belong to the "My country
>right or wrong." Even if that is not exactly true..It certainly IS MY
>COUNTRY and I am happy to be considered American wherever I happen to be in
>the world. As to whether we are "right or wrong".when we are right, I
>support it, when we are wrong, I will work to change it or modify.but I
>would never rush to blame my own country for the ills of the world.
>
>The remarkable thing is that you seem to posit that the "International
>Corporate Model is an American invention, and that we are the main
>villains.if there are actually villains. You seem to find the whole idea of
>labor for 'profit' to be execrable, and worse, you find the fact that
>people
>desire goods and services to be problematic as well. Perhaps you would
>like
>things to be produced in OZ under the guidance of saintly sorts who never
>exploit a cheaper labor market or a geopolitical advantage? This is almost
>a
>Ted Kazynski like argument.
>
>I will ignore the 'ad hominum' attacks in your retort, except to say.
>please
>check our website at
>
>www.ticonet.com
>
>and make your judgement about the horrid nature of what we do. I don't
>notice people attacking the phone company for allowing naughty things to be
>said on its wires. Our job does not include patrolling the morality of our
>clients. People like to play games, and I would really hate to live in a
>world designed by the moralists.like the Taliban or others who like to tell
>people what they should be doing.or what constitutes correct thought.
>
>The weird thing is..I now have the feeling that you Jon, and a few other of
>the "blame America first" crowd, seem to have more in sympathy with Bin
>Laden than you do with ordinary Americans, and I find that repugnant.
>
>Cordially.and you can stuff it too,
>
>tele
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp