racluster 3.0.6 vs 3.0.8 default aggregation?
Patrick Forsberg via Argus-info
argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Wed Dec 21 04:02:22 EST 2016
On 12/20/2016 04:38 PM, Carter Bullard wrote:
> Hey Patrick,
> Try argus-clients-3.0.8.2, which is the latest version.
>
> You aren’t going too crazy … 3.0.6 is correct, 3.0.8 is also correct, in that it does aggregate correctly, but testing reverse flow directions is not the default. I believe that that was changed back in argus-clients-3.0.8.2. Add “proto” to the mask definition in your last call, as the ports don’t really decode properly if we’ve thrown out the proto field.
>
> Carter
There's no difference between 3.0.8 and 3.0.8.2 as far as I can see.
Without -M correct no reverse flow matching
# /usr/local/src/Argus/argus-clients-3.0.8.2/bin/racluster -X -m saddr daddr proto sport dport -s+trans -r /tmp/ratest
StartTime Flgs Proto SrcAddr Sport Dir DstAddr Dport TotPkts TotBytes State Trans
09:04:56.941624 e udp 100.0.1.1.42461 -> 100.0.2.1.59307 1 77 INT 1
09:04:57.064776 e udp 100.0.2.1.59307 -> 100.0.1.1.42461 1 62 INT 1
With -M correct there also does not seem to be reverse flow matching which is odd.
# /usr/local/src/Argus/argus-clients-3.0.8.2/bin/racluster -X -m saddr daddr proto sport dport -M correct -s+trans -r /tmp/ratest
StartTime Flgs Proto SrcAddr Sport Dir DstAddr Dport TotPkts TotBytes State Trans
09:04:56.941624 e udp 100.0.1.1.42461 -> 100.0.2.1.59307 1 77 INT 1
09:04:57.064776 e udp 100.0.2.1.59307 -> 100.0.1.1.42461 1 62 INT 1
Finally, I run it with racluster.conf and as I have understood things this is the same as the above command line but now it works as I expect.
#### racluster.conf ####
RACLUSTER_AUTO_CORRECTION=yes
filter="" model="saddr daddr proto dport sport"
########################
# /usr/local/src/Argus/argus-clients-3.0.8.2/bin/racluster -X -f /tmp/racluster.conf -s+trans -r /tmp/ratest
StartTime Flgs Proto SrcAddr Sport Dir DstAddr Dport TotPkts TotBytes State Trans
09:04:56.941624 e udp 100.0.1.1.42461 <-> 100.0.2.1.59307 2 139 CON 2
>
>> On Dec 20, 2016, at 4:31 AM, Patrick Forsberg via Argus-info <argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm going nuts over aggregation in 3.0.6 and 3.0.8 and realize that I obviously haven't understood a thing.
>>
>> Given a simple UDP flow between two hosts
>> # ra -X -r /tmp/ratest
>> StartTime Flgs Proto SrcAddr Sport Dir DstAddr Dport TotPkts TotBytes State
>> 09:04:56.941624 e udp 100.0.1.1.42461 -> 100.0.2.1.59307 1 77 INT
>> 09:04:57.064776 e udp 100.0.2.1.59307 -> 100.0.1.1.42461 1 62 INT
>>
>> Simply running racluster with no configuration files (-X) gives different results on 3.0.6 and 3.0.8
>>
>> # /usr/local/src/Argus/argus-clients-3.0.6/bin/racluster -X -s+trans -r /tmp/ratest
>> StartTime Flgs Proto SrcAddr Sport Dir DstAddr Dport TotPkts TotBytes State Trans
>> 09:04:56.941624 e udp 100.0.1.1.42461 <-> 100.0.2.1.59307 2 139 CON 2
>>
>> # /usr/local/src/Argus/argus-clients-3.0.8/bin/racluster -X -s+trans -r /tmp/ratest
>> StartTime Flgs Proto SrcAddr Sport Dir DstAddr Dport TotPkts TotBytes State Trans
>> 09:04:56.941624 e udp 100.0.1.1.42461 -> 100.0.2.1.59307 1 77 INT 1
>> 09:04:57.064776 e udp 100.0.2.1.59307 -> 100.0.1.1.42461 1 62 INT 1
>>
>> It seems that 3.0.6 has the "expected behavior" for me.
>>
>> Running 3.0.8 with "-M correct" gives the same result as for 3.0.6
>>
>> # /usr/local/src/Argus/argus-clients-3.0.8/bin/racluster -X -M correct -s+trans -r /tmp/ratest
>> StartTime Flgs Proto SrcAddr Sport Dir DstAddr Dport TotPkts TotBytes State Trans
>> 09:04:56.941624 e udp 100.0.1.1.42461 <-> 100.0.2.1.59307 2 139 CON 2
>>
>> This implies that 3.0.8 doesn't use the classic 5-tuple (what is the classic 5-tuple by the way?) and I thought I was on to something until I tried
>>
>> # /usr/local/src/Argus/argus-clients-3.0.8/bin/racluster -X -m saddr daddr sport dport -M correct -s+trans -r /tmp/ratest
>> StartTime Flgs Proto SrcAddr Sport Dir DstAddr Dport TotPkts TotBytes State Trans
>> 09:04:56.941624 e udp 100.0.1.1.42461 -> 100.0.2.1.59307 1 77 INT 1
>> 09:04:57.064776 e udp 100.0.2.1.59307 -> 100.0.1.1.42461 1 62 INT 1
>>
>> Now all of a sudden "-M correct" doesn't seem to help in aggregating the records.
>>
>> What am I missing here?
>>
>> /Patrick
>>
>
More information about the argus
mailing list