Errors in gap detection

Carter Bullard carter at qosient.com
Wed Oct 22 13:28:28 EDT 2014


Can you send the pcap file ??  Does argus generale the crazy
numbers with this file ???
Carter

> On Oct 22, 2014, at 9:39 AM, elof2 at sentor.se wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Carter!
> 
> FYI, the gap detection counters still show some wonky numbers in 3.0.8.
> 
> ra -Zb -s flgs spkts dpkts state:13 sgap dgap -nr gaps.argus - tcp | grep g
> 
> Normal and OK gaps show up like this:
>     Flgs  SrcPkts  DstPkts         State   SrcGap   DstGap
> e g            15       24         PA_PA        0      458
> e g             3        3         PA_PA        0      284
> e g             5        6         PA_PA        0      732
> e g           129      284         PA_PA        0     1367
> e g            66       94         PA_PA        0     1367
> e g             2        2         PA_PA        0      801
> 
> ...but here and there I get lines like this:
> e g             7        6     FSPA_FSPA 3051561* 8894044*
> e g             7        6     FSPA_FSPA 1142343* 8891853*
> e g             7        6     FSPA_FSPA 98000397 7385371*
> e g             6        4     FSPA_FSPA 59208794 6255514*
> e g            20       20     FSPA_FSPA 3468512*    65538
> e g            20       20     FSPA_FSPA 3468512*    65538
> e g             5        6       SPA_SPA 2562525* 9087142*
> e g             7        6     FSPA_FSPA 68629719 5826434*
> e g             7        6     FSPA_FSPA -214748* 5815425*
> e g             7        6     FSPA_FSPA -214748* 1919818*
> e g            17       24     FSPA_FSPA 3167486* 2765698*
> 
> This doesn't look as nice.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I tcpdump:ed traffic to pcap while argus created its logfile.
> I analysed two flows showing gaps, one normal with "0     1367" gaps and one wonky with "11274535 1767532*" gaps.
> 
> Wireshark analysis of the "normal flow" show identical numbers as argus; 0 gaps from src and 1367 bytes (one packet) missing (in mid-stream) from dst.
> Good.
> 
> Wireshark analysis of a "wonky" flow show no errors! No complaints at all from Wireshark (including its Expert Info). No "previous segment not captured" and no "ACKed unseen segment".
> Everything looks good in the pcap.
> I can't find any reason as to why argus create those wonky numbers.
> 
> 
> Oh, well, I don't use the gaps fields very often, so for me this is not important. I just thought I'd let you know.
> 
> /Elof
> 




More information about the argus mailing list