Label issues with last week's release

Tue Sep 3 21:50:33 EDT 2013

Carter,

In yet another demonstration of Murphy being the strongest force in nature,
I followed all of the instructions and everything worked just fine. NB: I
took great pains to ensure that I did not make install to keep the modified
version out of the wild. Everything worked exactly as advertised. I then
checked with the original client that caused the problem and now it works. 

I'll keep on watching to see what happens going forward, but at least I know
how to run the filter stuff through the debugger. BTW for the cocode stuff
ArgusFilterOrig line 391 is a good breakpoint.

--Dave

From: Carter Bullard [mailto:carter at qosient.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 7:48 PM
To: David Edelman
Cc: 'Argus'
Subject: Re: [ARGUS] Label issues with last week's release

Hey Dave,
There is a problem getting debug info from the filter code, as the compiler
is a forked process.
In ./common/argus_code.c, you will need to comment out line 102, recompile,
and now
-D9 with the -b option will show most of the compiler operations.  The best
way to 
debug the actual filtering, is to run the modified clients under gdb(), and
break in
ArgusFilterRecord().

You will need to remember to correct the modification to argus_code.c, when
you're
done, as all clients will dump core when processing filters, with the
ARGUS_FORK
commented out.

Carter 

On Sep 3, 2013, at 7:34 PM, "David Edelman" <dedelman at iname.com
<mailto:dedelman at iname.com> > wrote:

Carter,

For this test, Argus is running on a 64 bit system and the clients are
running on a 64 bit system. The dump of the filters match yours. When I run
the client on the same system as Argus, there is no difference. If there a
debug value that I can set to check the action of the filtering?

--Dave

ra -S rodnel-new:561 -s sco dco -  dst  co ZZ
[No output]

ra -S rodnel-new:561 -s sco dco -  src  co ZZ
[No output]

ra -S rodnel-new:561 -s sco dco -  co ZZ
[No output]

ra -S rodnel-new:561 -s sco dco -  not dst  co ZZ
sCo dCo
ZZ  US
ZZ  US
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ

ra -S rodnel-new:561 -s sco dco -  not src  co ZZ
sCo dCo
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ

ra -S rodnel-new:561 -s sco dco -  not co ZZ
sCo dCo
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  GB
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ
ZZ  ZZ

From: Carter Bullard [mailto:carter at qosient.com <http://qosient.com> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 1:09 PM
To: David Edelman
Cc: Argus (argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
<mailto:argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu> )
Subject: Re: [ARGUS] Label issues with last week's release

Hey Dave,
This is what I get for the two filters.

thoth:common carter$ ra -r * -b - not src co ZZ
(000) ldh      dsr[19][4]
(001) jeq      #0x0             jt 4  jf 2
(002) jeq      #0x5a5a          jt 3           jf 4
(003) ret      #0
(004) ret      #150

thoth:common carter$ ra -r * -b - src co ZZ
(000) ldh      dsr[19][4]
(001) jeq      #0x0             jt 4  jf 2
(002) jeq      #0x5a5a          jt 3           jf 4
(003) ret      #150
(004) ret      #0

So this looks right, on Mac OS X 10.8.4 with gcc
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build
5658) (LLVM build 2336.11.00).  Load the 16-bit value 4 bytes into the
COCODE DSR, and if not zero, compare with "ZZ".

And, the filters works fine on this and all the 64-bit Linux's I have.
Are you on a 32-bit machine?

Carter

On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:30 PM, David Edelman < <mailto:dedelman at iname.com>
dedelman at iname.com> wrote:

For flow records with valid cocode values including a lot of ZZs I get

ra -r * -b - src co ZZ

(000) ldh dsr[19][4]
(001) jeq #0x0  jt 4. jf 2
(002) jeq #0x5a5a jt 3 jf 4
(003) ret #0
(004) ret #150

If I filter on not src co ZZ I get all the records including ZZ

Dave Edelman

On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:09, David Edelman < <mailto:dedelman at iname.com>
dedelman at iname.com> wrote:
I'm not sure if this is related. If not I'll start a new thread. 

The sco and dco values are not making it into the cocode DSR correctly. I
tried to kill the DSR and the clients still baulk. 

The ralabel config seems to play a role for some of the problems

Filtering on co also seems to be a problem and the generated BPF code looks
odd. This may call for the use of offsetof in 64 bit environments. 

More when I can send samples. 

Dave Edelman

On Sep 3, 2013, at 8:13, Carter Bullard < <mailto:carter at qosient.com>
carter at qosient.com> wrote:
Hey Craig,
So I'm back and its time to fix this label problem, as others are starting
to report it.
It may take me a little while to figure out where we are on this bug.  If
you have any
new observations, sending to the list would be great...

Radium is stable for you ( > 4 days ?).

Please send a separate email around your rastream() issue.  Better to have
separate threads for each problem.

Carter 

On Aug 26, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Craig Merchant <
<mailto:cmerchant at responsys.com> cmerchant at responsys.com> wrote:

Carter,

>From previous emails sent to the list I was under the impression that you
had discovered some differences between how ralabel handles labels vs how
radium does.  Did those differences get resolved in the latest release?  I'm
still seeing some issues with duplicate labels.

For example.  For IP 10.10.10.10, my label file (in order) looks like:

10.10.10.0/24 internal,DC2,I5-Apache-UI
10.10.10.10  apacheui,ri5

Yet my Argus events look like:

"1377565200.000,e
*,tcp,63.166.75.3,0,->,10.10.10.10,9051,1599,685729,SRPA_SPA,56,300.000,4783
34,207395,2.857,2.467,0.443,US,ZZ,daddr=internal#DC2#I5-Apache-UI#apacheui#r
i5#apacheui#ri5#apacheui#ri5#apacheui#ri5"

Not sure why the host-specific label is repeated 4 times, but that's
consistent with other events I'm seeing.

In other (good) news, it would seem like the radium crashing issue has been
fixed in the latest release.  I know we are a corner case as far as radium
stability goes, but it's been running for four days without stopping and
that's a positive change.

We may be experiencing some issues with rastream though.  I sent you our
rastream search and the shell scripts it calls at the end of each time
interval.  It's been working fine for a few days, but it seems to have lost
track of the files it's processing, so no new events are coming in and old
files aren't being deleted.  I'll dive deeper into that that this week and
see if I can narrow down the problem.

Thanksa again for all the fixes!

C

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/argus/attachments/20130903/c4c171b9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6283 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/argus/attachments/20130903/c4c171b9/attachment.bin>