ra reads argus file very slow
Zi Hu
zihu at usc.edu
Thu Oct 31 18:28:51 EDT 2013
Jesper Skou Jensen <jesper.skou.jensen <at> uni-c.dk> writes:
>
> What about avoiding writing to disk at all, but instead redirecting to
> /dev/null, that way it's only the reading that's an issue.
>
I just tried to redirecting the output to /dev/null. It is still very slow.
> This should be very fast, as fast as your HDD can read.
> time cat tmp/201320d-060000.argus > /dev/null
>
> Using RA is much more CPU intensive, and will take considerable longer.
> These two should take almost the same time.
> time ra -r tmp/201320d-060000.argus > /dev/null
> time ra -nr tmp/201320d-060000.argus > /dev/null
>
> On my system a quick test shows that it takes about 430 times longer to
> process the ra commands than the cat.
On my test, it is about 200 times longer than "cat".
I didn't expect parsing the argus data would be so slow.
That's why I am guessing "ra" does more than just parsing the argus data.
-Zi
>
> --
> Regards
> Jesper
>
More information about the argus
mailing list