ra reads argus file very slow
Zi Hu
zihu at usc.edu
Thu Oct 31 18:39:23 EDT 2013
Hi, Carter, thanks for your suggestion.
I just tried the latest version of clients as you suggested, but it doesn't
make any difference.
Besides, one thing that is not clear to me is why the performance is
non-linear in the number or records. E.g.:
time ra -uX -r 2013-09-01-0700/temp/20130831-223000-hWukIYC-lander4.argus
-N 5000000 >/dev/null
real 5m58.211s
user 5m54.969s
sys 0m3.027s
time ra -uX -r 2013-09-01-0700/temp/20130831-223000-hWukIYC-lander4.argus
-N 10000000 >/dev/null
real 22m2.487s
user 21m55.113s
sys 0m6.782s
thanks
-Zi
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Carter Bullard <carter at qosient.com> wrote:
> Hey Zi,
> Could you try the newer developers version of the clients, to see if you
> see any difference ??? This is the code that will become
> argus-clients-3.0.8.
>
> http://qosient.com/argus/dev/argus-clients-latest.tar.gz
>
> Carter
>
> Carter Bullard, QoSient, LLC
> 150 E. 57th Street Suite 12D
> New York, New York 10022
> +1 212 588-9133 Phone
> +1 212 588-9134 Fax
>
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Zi Hu <zihu at usc.edu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Carter Bullard <carter at qosient.com>wrote:
>
>> Hey Zi,
>> Well, based on the performance of racount(), I'd say the subject line is
>> a little off, in that we can read the file, and decode all the records
>> pretty quickly,... 10.29 seconds. Looks like the ra* programs can process
>> the file faster than you can cat() it, so I'd say the problem is in writing
>> to the disk. Maybe you have some disk errors?? Did you check your system
>> logs ???
>>
>>
> Hi, Carter,
> Thanks for your comments, but I didn't see any disk errors from the system
> logs.
> Moreover, I don't think disk errors are the cause, since I "cat" and "ra"
> the same file on the same machine. If I have some disk errors, they both
> should be slow. Besides, I also copy the 2G argus file to another
> machine, still it takes more than 80 minutes to read the file with "ra".
>
> I did another test:
> I made another ~2G argus file and run "ra" on it, this time it is much
> faster (about 12 minutes), although it is still slow compared to "cat"
> (about 24 seconds).
> zihu at proton:~$ time ra -r tmp/201320d-060000.argus -u > temp.dat
>
> real 11m55.636s
> user 11m16.636s
> sys 0m38.653s
>
> zihu at proton:~$ time cat tmp/201320d-060000.argus > temp.dat
>
> real 0m24.298s
> user 0m0.009s
> sys 0m3.747s
>
> zihu at proton:~$ time racount -r tmp/201320d-060000.argus
> racount records total_pkts src_pkts dst_pkts
> total_bytes src_bytes dst_bytes
> sum 18357344 814467265 557563621 256903644
> 937278498435 620800235862 316478262573
>
> real 0m10.753s
> user 0m9.902s
> sys 0m0.832s
>
>
> For me, it looks like "ra" runs fast on some files, while it becomes slow
> on certain files.
> Do you have a reason why "ra" performs differently on different files?
> Could this be a potential bug of "ra"?
> By the way, it is still not quite clear for me why the memory keeps
> growing when I run the "ra" command.
>
> -Zi
>
>
>
>> Carter
>>
>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 8:43 PM, Zi Hu <zihu at usc.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your reply, Carter.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Carter Bullard <carter at qosient.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Zi,
>>> The only time I’ve seen ra() have problems reading and writing
>>> data, to the level you report, is when one tries to do DNS
>>> lookups to get the names of the IP addresses, instead of
>>> dotted decimal notation.
>>>
>>>
>> By default, "ra" won't perform DNS lookups right? If this is true, given
>> the command line I used in my experiment, I don't think it does DNS
>> lookups.
>> Besides, I also tried -nn option, it doesn't make much difference.
>>
>>
>>> I can read about 2G of flow data in about 65 secs, on a
>>> standard machine, but I can cat() that file in about
>>> 2.5 secs, so your machine may not be performing as well
>>> as you would want.
>>>
>>> What version of argus and clients are you using??
>>>
>>
>> 3.0.6
>>
>>
>>> Do you have a .rarc file in your home directory?
>>>
>>
>> I don't see a .rarc file in my home directory.
>>
>>
>>
>>> What does a line of ra() output look like ?
>>>
>>>
>> zihu at proton:~$ ra -r
>> 2013-09-01-0700/temp/20130831-223000-hWukIYC-lander4.argus -u | head
>> StartTime Flgs Proto SrcAddr Sport Dir
>> DstAddr Dport TotPkts TotBytes State
>> 1378009800.024648 e tcp 129.82.228.28.11021 <?>
>> 74.125.142.131.xmpp-* 2 144 CON
>> 1378009800.000000 e d tcp 129.82.97.104.63194 ->
>> 129.82.224.179.https 10 1154 CON
>> 1378009800.132037 e tcp 129.82.12.68.57547 ->
>> 75.130.96.44.59943 2 1414 CON
>> 1378009800.131337 e udp 129.82.12.66.44115 <->
>> 131.254.208.196.44295 2 234 CON
>> 1378009800.000000 e d tcp 129.82.227.103.ica <?>
>> 129.82.97.52.49341 11 882 CON
>> 1378009800.173511 e udp 129.82.12.66.44115 <->
>> 211.69.207.154.38275 2 215 CON
>> 1378009800.619227 e icmp 129.82.12.68.0x0303 ->
>> 143.215.131.247.0xd782 1 102 URP
>> 1378009800.623714 e icmp 129.82.12.68.0x0303 ->
>> 143.215.131.247.0xd882 1 102 URP
>> 1378009800.719767 e icmp 192.43.217.17.0x000b ->
>> 129.82.12.68.0x0000 1 70 TXD
>>
>>
>>
>> Besides, the following is some information about the 2G argus file on my
>> machine, not sure if this can help you to diagnose the issue.
>> zihu at proton:~$ time racount -r
>> 2013-09-01-0700/temp/20130831-223000-hWukIYC-lander4.argus
>> racount records total_pkts src_pkts dst_pkts
>> total_bytes src_bytes dst_bytes
>> sum 20327732 127070924 81280364 45790560
>> 108939377747 66625641107 42313736640
>>
>> real 0m10.297s
>> user 0m9.478s
>> sys 0m0.780s
>>
>>
>> thanks
>> -Zi
>>
>>
>>
>>> Carter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 6:34 PM, Zi Hu <zihu at usc.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Carter,
>>>
>>> In my application, I need a simple tool to read what it is in the argus
>>> file, then output certain fields that I am interested in ascii format, such
>>> as srcip, dstip, sport, dport. protocol, ....
>>>
>>> I thought the command "ra" is what I need. However, I find it is very
>>> slow to read the argus data with "ra". I did a small experiment: dump the
>>> same argus file (about 2G) with both "ra" and "cat".
>>> Using the "ra" command, it took me about 87 minutes to read the file,
>>> while it took only 40 seconds to dump it with "cat". and also I notice
>>> that the memory keeps growing when I am running "ra".
>>>
>>> zihu at proton:~$ time cat
>>> 2013-09-01-0700/temp/20130831-223000-hWukIYC-lander4.argus > temp.dat
>>>
>>> real 0m39.490s
>>> user 0m0.027s
>>> sys 0m4.204s
>>> zihu at proton:~$ time ra -r
>>> 2013-09-01-0700/temp/20130831-223000-hWukIYC-lander4.argus -u > temp.dat
>>>
>>> real 87m40.973s
>>> user 86m42.397s
>>> sys 0m56.256s
>>> zihu at proton:~$
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So I guess "ra" does more than just reading the argus file, formatting
>>> and outputing the result. Does "ra" keep track of flows in memory so that
>>> the memory keeps growing ?
>>>
>>> If "ra" is not the right choice for my application, then what's the
>>> right command for this simple application? Or if we don't have such a tool,
>>> I am thinking of writing one by myself. Could you point me where to start?
>>> Any suggestions are welcomed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Zi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/argus/attachments/20131031/ee6b3f76/attachment.html>
More information about the argus
mailing list