Rewrite of rastream

[David Edelman]

I must admit that I never saw the original problem but I can say that the
updated code is working just fine. I don't see any loss in data and I do
compare it with the original flow records which I save the old fashioned way
directly from Argus on the originating system.
 
 
 
--Dave
 
From: Carter Bullard [mailto:carter at qosient.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 2:40 PM
To: David Edelman
Cc: 'Matt Brown'; argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: [ARGUS] Rewrite of rastream
 
Gentle men,
Any improvements in rastream()?
Carter
 
 
On Jun 10, 2013, at 8:44 PM, David Edelman <dedelman at iname.com
<mailto:dedelman at iname.com> > wrote:



Carter,
 
I think that one of the files is not the one you expected to send.
 
--Dave
 
From: argus-info-bounces+dedelman=iname.com at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
<mailto:argus-info-bounces+dedelman=iname.com at lists.andrew.cmu.edu>
[mailto:argus-info-bounces+dedelman=iname.com at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
<mailto:info-bounces+dedelman=iname.com at lists.andrew.cmu.edu> ] On Behalf
OfCarter Bullard
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 4:47 PM
To: Matt Brown
Cc: argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu <mailto:argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu>

Subject: Re: [ARGUS] Rewrite of rastream
 
Hey Matt,
Give these two files a try.  This version of rastream.c does the record
rejection, and the argus_util.c is needed to make debug message for -d
daemons to go to syslog.  So, .., put rastream.c in ./examples/rastream,
and argus_util.c in ./common.  make again, and give it a try.
 
Should give you something that seems to work, but it may be working
because its throwing data away.  Give this a test run, and then, lets
try to fix your issue.
 
Carter 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/argus/attachments/20130617/338ff351/attachment.html>