possible radium issue

[Phillip Deneault]

Carter Bullard wrote:
> Just need to find the bad file, and then try to figure out how it got 
> corrupted
> (at least that is my guess).
> 

So, assuming all those files were bad, and starting fresh with this 
morning's data, I get worse, confusing results.  Clustered is still 
being run without the '-M norep) and WithoutClustering is still just the 
straight racount.  Data from the 8 o'clock hour:

				Clustered	WithoutClustering
An hour of slices		756052		1250780
An hourly file			81		82

Locally generated file(-t 08)	25745		394546

My gut instinct is that the locally generated file is correct again, but 
I can't explain how an hour of slices yields _more_ records than the 
locally generated file, especially when clustered.

So, I broke them down....

File		Clustered	WithoutClustering
00		28		28
10		42		42
20		73		75
30		126		126
40		755800		1250438
50		71		71

In looking at the locally generated file manually, it appears the 
distribution of flows over the hour has no such giant peak.

Phil