Sparc64 OpenBSD4.1 Compile issue

[Carter Bullard]

The clock in your earlier records was saying Jan 1970 as
well.   Is the clock set on this machine?

Carter


On Feb 7, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Eric Pancer wrote:

> On Feb 7, 2008 3:46 PM, Carter Bullard <carter at qosient.com> wrote:
>> Oh no, don't feel dumb!!!!  That's software's job to catch that  
>> stuff.
>> I was stripping out a preceding and trailing double-quote, but only
>> one.  I always wonder if I'm suppose to catch these types of errors
>> or generate syntax errors.  I think I'll just strip out as many
>> as there are, as long as its not a full buffer of ".
>>
>> New software on the server for both argus and clients with your
>> changes in them.
>
> I spoke too soon on this working. Timestamps in flow records seem to  
> be whacky.
>
> $ date
> Thu Feb  7 16:24:05 CST 2008
> 1970-01-04 00:35:0  e         udp      10.15.223.2.1985      ->
>  224.0.0.2.1985          1         62   INT
> 1970-01-04 00:35:0  e         udp      10.15.223.2.1985      ->
>  224.0.0.2.1985          1         62   INT
> 1970-01-11 06:01:1  *         llc     0:d:29:4b:c:25.66        ->
> 1:80:c2:0:0:0.66            1         60   INT
> 1970-01-11 06:01:1  *         llc     0:d:29:4b:c:25.66        ->
> 1:80:c2:0:0:0.66            1         60   INT
> 1970-01-11 05:48:1  *         llc     0:d:29:4b:c:25.66        ->
> 1:80:c2:0:0:0.66            1         60   INT
> 1970-01-11 05:48:1  *         llc     0:d:29:4b:c:25.66        ->
> 1:80:c2:0:0:0.66            1         60   INT
> 1970-01-11 16:24:2  e         udp      10.15.223.3.1985      ->
>  224.0.0.2.1985          1         62   INT
> 1970-01-11 16:24:2  e         udp      10.15.223.3.1985      ->
>  224.0.0.2.1985          1         62   INT
> 1970-01-07 11:24:2  e         udp      10.15.223.2.1985      ->
>  224.0.0.2.1985          1         62   INT
> 1970-01-07 11:24:2  e         udp      10.15.223.2.1985      ->
>  224.0.0.2.1985          1         62   INT
> 1970-01-11 06:05:4  *         llc     0:d:29:4b:c:25.66        ->
> 1:80:c2:0:0:0.66            1         60   INT
> 1970-01-11 06:05:4  *         llc     0:d:29:4b:c:25.66        ->
> 1:80:c2:0:0:0.66            1         60   INT
> 1970-01-11 06:23:5  *         llc     0:d:29:4b:c:25.66        ->
> 1:80:c2:0:0:0.66            1         60   INT
> 1970-01-11 06:23:5  *         llc     0:d:29:4b:c:25.66        ->
> 1:80:c2:0:0:0.66            1         60   INT
>
> My rarc(5) file yields the following.
>
> $ cat ~/.rarc
> RA_ARGUS_SERVER=10.15.223.172:561
> RA_TIME_FORMAT="%Y-%m-%d %T.%f"
>
> Could this be due to the patches on common/argus_main.c ?
>