racluster, wounded after battling a dragon...
Denton, Rick
rick.denton at cybertrust.com
Wed Nov 1 02:03:03 EST 2006
the filter="" syntax goes filter="src net 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0"
given the strtol() processing of the network length on the saddr/daddr
you may also want to use
the [sd]addr/255.255.255.0 syntax instead temporarily ;)
yes.. i muttered about the strtol() in a previous diff..
it is actually more fundamentally incorrect than that..
the declaration isn't 'char *endptr = NULL;' it is 'char **endptr =
NULL'!!
hence gcc doesn't bleat about the missing & in call to strtol()... :)
yes.. endptr is always going to be null going into strtol() and thus
will never be set so the subsequent test for failure will always
succeed..
'endptr' is passed directly into strtol you need &endptr but this will
be a char *** if you cast htis back it'll work.. but also be very wrong
;)
should read imho (as per one of my previous diffs):
char *endptr = NULL;
..
if ((len = strtol(ptr, &endptr, 10)) == 0)
the test for actual validity is also incorrect and doesn't check all
cases..
because mptr != endptr doesn't mean mptr contained a real number it
means at least the first char did..
now strtol() actually has a real endptr and endptr has memory strtol()
will populate it properly the test for validity should go along the
lines of:
if ((endptr <= ptr) || (*endptr != '\0')) then error
or (endptr == ptr) if you like but it shouldn't be lower than it
either.. :)
and yes, len would make sense :\ i guess i hadn't previously tested the
/<netlen> variant enough to notice :/
error checking is quite lacking :(.. i started a racluster on some data
friday afternoon before leaving.. seemingly i had stupidly fed it a
ragator config instead of a racluster config :) it didn't notice and was
happy to consume cpu cycles all weekend until i noticed it was going
nowhere and killed it :) just need to be more careful..
it would only check over saddr/daddr mpls because it is looking through
a mask list ie a mask to modify the value for the aggregate as per the
model and masking on the ports doesn't make too much sense(although to
do so would be interesting ;)).. aggregating on ports (well proto and
dport tuple at least) appears to work correctly from my testing you will
just need to change your filter syntax and optionally your daddr and
saddr modifiers..
________________________________
From: argus-info-bounces at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
[mailto:argus-info-bounces at lists.andrew.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of Adrian
Bool
Sent: Wednesday, 1 November 2006 03:24 ish
To: argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: [ARGUS] racluster, wounded after battling a dragon...
Hi,
I have previously used ragator to look a traffic flows from
archived pcap data. Over the last couple of days I've been trying to do
similar in Argus 3rc33 with racluster.
I'm trying for a filter of the form,
filter="src net 192.168.0.0/16" model="saddr/24 daddr/24 dport"
Whilst trying to get the data I want I have found a couple of
bugs in the function argus_client.c::ArgusNewAggregator,
Mask length decoding,
Currently we have,
char * endptr = NULL ;
if ((len = strtol(mptr, endptr, 10)) == 0)
if (*endptr == mptr)
ArgusLog (LOG_ERR, "syntax error: %s %s", mptr,
strerror(errno));
... but really need ...
char * endptr = NULL ;
if ((len = strtol(mptr, &endptr, 10)) == 0)
if (endptr == mptr)
ArgusLog (LOG_ERR, "syntax error: %s %s", mptr,
strerror(errno));
... and possibly bomb out if we hit the syntax error. strtol
stakes a char ** as its second argument - and if that is NULL it will
not return any endptr information. So, we pass the address of the NULL
ptr, it places the end of processing ptr in our end ptr and then we can
just compare normal pointers.
Then, there is currently,
if (len <= 32)
mask.addr_un.ipv4 = (0xFFFFFFFF << (32 - retn->saddrlen));
The mask.addr_un.ipv4 is not a function of the len we just
decoded! Using the following seems to be ok,
if (len <= 32)
mask.addr_un.ipv4 = (0xFFFFFFFF << (32 - len));
saddrlen (or daddrlen) seems to be set as appropriate lower
down.
I'm actually looking at aggregating on destination port - which
worked pretty well in ragator. Lower down this function iterates through
members of ArgusMaskDefs but only seem to be picking up saddr, daddr,
smpls and dmpls. sport and dport seem to be ignored. Is aggregation on
ports not implemented as yet?
Regards,
aid
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/argus/attachments/20061101/577bf6a5/attachment.html>
More information about the argus
mailing list