a curiousity ...

[Peter Van Epp]

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:51:20AM +0000, carter at qosient.com wrote:
> Hey Peter,
> I'll take a look at the window stats.  As always, having an argus record that demonstrates the problem, makes it soooo much easier!!!

	I'll send you a copy. 

> 
> The management start time is the start time of the probe, which seems correct in your example.  This allows "dur" to provide probe up time.  I think that has been the behavior from the beginning of time.  Is this incorrect?
> 
	It is different than 2.0.6 (and I think somewhat less useful). In 
2.0.6 the start time is in the first man record and all the rest have current
time:

vanepp at r2d2% ra -r com_argus.2006.08.16.06.00.00.0.gz -- man
25 Nov 05 19:11:05           man  229.97.122.203  v2.0                   1 0     0        0         0            0           STA
16 Aug 06 05:57:29           man  229.97.122.203  v2.0          3802222795 4764191273892  0         605109973    65714       CON
16 Aug 06 06:02:29           man  229.97.122.203  v2.0          3802321512 4793091340256  0         620108940    62475       CON

	On 2.0.6 I can select for man records and from the time stamps see if
the sensor has gone down.

> Carter
> 
> 
> Carter Bullard
> QoSient LLC
> 150 E. 57th Street Suite 12D
> New York, New York 10022
> +1 212 588-9133 Phone
> +1 212 588-9134 Fax  
>

Peter Van Epp / Operations and Technical Support 
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. Canada