[ARGUS] sasl a solution (ugly, but a solution :-))

[Peter Van Epp]

	Doesn't appear to work:

test6# ./configure --include-dir="/usr/local/include/sasl1" --with-sasl=/usr/local
configure: error: unrecognized option: --include-dir=/usr/local/include/sasl1
Try `./configure --help' for more information.

test6# ./configure --include-dir="/usr/local/include/sasl1" \                   ? --with-sasl=/usr/local
configure: error: unrecognized option: --include-dir=/usr/local/include/sasl1
Try `./configure --help' for more information.

test6# ./configure --include-dir=/usr/local/include/sasl1 --with-sasl=/usr/local 
configure: error: unrecognized option: --include-dir=/usr/local/include/sasl1
Try `./configure --help' for more information.

Peter Van Epp / Operations and Technical Support 
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. Canada

On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 12:05:07PM -0400, Carter Bullard wrote:
> Hey Eric,
>    Yes that should already be supported in the existing
> configure script, so we should be testing that on some of
> these systems, and if that doesn't work, we'll need to fix it.
> 
> Carter
> 
> 
> > From: eric <eric-list-argus at catastrophe.net>
> > Organization: Catastrophe.Net <http://www.catastrophe.net/>
> > Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:36:55 -0500
> > To: Carter Bullard <carter at qosient.com>
> > Cc: Argus <argus-info at lists.andrew.cmu.edu>
> > Subject: Re: [ARGUS] sasl a solution (ugly, but a solution :-))
> > 
> > On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 10:43:38 -0400, Carter Bullard proclaimed...
> > 
> >> So, even official cyrus sasl clients, like imap or sendmail don't
> >> have a "find sasl.h" m4 macro, so, ....,  it will take a bit of
> >> crafting to fix this one in configure.in and aclocal.m4.  I'll
> >> add the patch below for now.
> > 
> > Hey Carter et al,
> > 
> > I definitely think linking against SASL is one of the main reasons
> > more people don't implement it. Is there a way to generate a
> > Makefile based on something like...
> > 
> >  ./configure --with-sasl=/usr/local/sasl
> > 
> > or something like that? It might make deployment much easier, and
> > perhaps we could even push maintainers of some platforms to offer
> > linked versions of argus as well for instantaneous fortune and glory :)
> > 
> > Something like
> > 
> >  argus-2.0.7-sasl
> > 
> > etc..
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > - Eric
> > 
>