BPF tweak; negative impact?
Carter Bullard
carter at qosient.com
Wed Feb 21 15:56:26 EST 2001
Oh yes,
The man status records give packets dropped status just like
tcpdump does, so if you want to get frequent reporting, run
argus with "-M 60" or "-M 30" to get argus status records
every 60 or 30 seconds.
Carter
Carter Bullard
QoSient, LLC
300 E. 56th Street, Suite 18K
New York, New York 10022
carter at qosient.com
Phone +1 212 588-9133
Fax +1 212 588-9134
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-argus at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
> [mailto:owner-argus at lists.andrew.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of Scott
> A. McIntyre
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 3:22 PM
> To: Argus Mailing List
> Subject: BPF tweak; negative impact?
>
>
> Could the bpf tweak for FreeBSD and argus be causing a
> severely negative
> impact upon other applications that are BPF intensive? For example,
> I've seen the following from one application:
>
> received 98933 packets and dropped 32460(32.810%) packets.
>
> tcpdump 3.6.2 says:
>
> 58926 packets received by filter
> 54615 packets dropped by kernel
>
> (using libpcap 0.6.2, as well)
>
> Now, that improves dramatically (in the tcpdump case) if I log to a
> file only, but even so, I'm concerned that more data may be going
> missing than I intend.
>
> Is there a way to get these sort of statistics from argus; how many
> packets were seen by the kernel, but dropped before the bpf
> buffer could
> be emptied?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/argus/attachments/20010221/f9fb093d/attachment.html>
More information about the argus
mailing list